Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
Would this OpenJPA store be for IMAP only?
...yes but...
IMAP is complex and has very specific storage requirem
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Megha Agarval wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was using SMTPS and POP3S to send and receive mails successfully with the
>> phoenix deployment I had downloaded a couple of months back. But, after
>> updating my sources to the latest version of
Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems with that.
For example CipherStorageProvider contains this innocent looking lines of code:
catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e)
Interesting comment below on the use of JCR (hierarchical schemata) or a
JPA implementation. (RDBMS)
What would you consider the pro/con argument of one vs the other?
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30
Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
> Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
> compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems with that.
>
> For example CipherStorageProvider contains this innocent looking lines of
> code:
>
> catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {
>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
>> Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
>> compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems with that.
>>
>> For example CipherStorageProvider contains this innocent looking lines o
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
>> Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
>> compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems with that.
>>
>> For example CipherStorageProvider contains this innocent looking lines o
Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems with that.
For example CipherStorageProvider contains this innocent
+1
Norman
2009/1/6 Oleg Kalnichevski :
> Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>
>>> Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven plugin to build a JDK1.4
compatible jar file. Now I've noticed a few problems w
Author: mwiederkehr
Date: Tue Jan 6 10:50:13 2009
New Revision: 732049
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732049&view=rev
Log:
Dropped JDK 1.4 support
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/mime4j/trunk/pom.xml?r
Author: mwiederkehr
Date: Tue Jan 6 10:51:04 2009
New Revision: 732051
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732051&view=rev
Log:
Changed Mode into a Java 5 enum because JDK 1.4 support has been dropped
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/message/Mode.java
Mod
Done..
Markus
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> +1
> Norman
>
> 2009/1/6 Oleg Kalnichevski :
>> Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto:
>
> Mime4j uses the retrotranslator maven
Author: mwiederkehr
Date: Tue Jan 6 10:58:27 2009
New Revision: 732056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732056&view=rev
Log:
Implements Iterable to support enhanced for-loops
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/address/AddressList.java
james/mi
The Apache James Project is pleased to announce that the Apache Mailet
2.4 release is now available for download at
http://james.apache.org/download.cgi#Apache%20Mailet.
The Mailet API is a mature standard for enterprise mail agents. For more
details see http://james.apache.org/mailet/.
A Mailet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Markus Wiederkehr reassigned MIME4J-96:
---
Assignee: Markus Wiederkehr
> Field.parse() should defer parsing until the parsed valu
Author: mwiederkehr
Date: Tue Jan 6 11:25:25 2009
New Revision: 732068
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732068&view=rev
Log:
Deferred parsing of header fields (MIME4J-96).
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mime4j/field/AddressListField.java
james/mime4j/t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12661271#action_12661271
]
Markus Wiederkehr commented on MIME4J-96:
-
Patch applied. The test now runs under 22
Would it be a problem to change the return type of Message.getSubject?
Markus
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
wrote:
> I've noticed that Message has a method getSubject() that returns the
> subject as UnstructuredField.
>
> In my opinion it would be more practical if getSubject
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:22 AM, hanasaki wrote:
> Interesting comment below on the use of JCR (hierarchical schemata) or a JPA
> implementation. (RDBMS)
>
> What would you consider the pro/con argument of one vs the other?
the way i see things:
JCR is more document-centric. this makes integrati
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
wrote:
> Would it be a problem to change the return type of Message.getSubject?
i'm not a fan of the legacy message API so i generally keep quiet...
> Markus
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
> wrote:
>> I've noticed that Mes
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Jan 6 12:09:45 2009
New Revision: 732092
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732092&view=rev
Log:
Push exception handling into mappers
Added:
james/protocols/imap/trunk/mailbox/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/mailbox/StorageException.java
Modified:
james
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
>
> Would this OpenJPA store b
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Jan 6 12:25:43 2009
New Revision: 732097
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732097&view=rev
Log:
Renamed mappers. Original names will be reused for interfaces.
Added:
james/protocols/imap/trunk/jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/jpa/mail/JPAMailboxMapper.ja
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
> wrote:
>> Would it be a problem to change the return type of Message.getSubject?
>
> i'm not a fan of the legacy message API so i generally keep quiet...
May I ask why not? I think
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Markus Wiederkehr
>> wrote:
>>> Would it be a problem to change the return type of Message.getSubject?
>>
>> i'm not a fan of the legacy me
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Jan 6 12:53:21 2009
New Revision: 732114
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732114&view=rev
Log:
Factor out interfaces for mappers.
Added:
james/protocols/imap/trunk/jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/jpa/JPASubscriptionManager.java
(contents, props chan
Modified:
james/protocols/imap/trunk/jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/store/mail/MessageMapper.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/protocols/imap/trunk/jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/store/mail/MessageMapper.java?rev=732125&r1=732124&r2=732125&view=diff
==
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Jan 6 13:46:20 2009
New Revision: 732131
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732131&view=rev
Log:
Corrected bad links
Modified:
james/mailet/current/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
Modified: james/mailet/current/src/site/xdoc/index.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/
Robert Burrell Donkin [mailto:robertburrelldon...@gmail.com] wrote on: 06
January 2009 19:53
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:22 AM, hanasaki
> wrote:
> > Interesting comment below on the use of JCR (hierarchical
> schemata) or a JPA
> > implementation. (RDBMS)
> >
> > What would you consider the pro/c
Author: mwiederkehr
Date: Tue Jan 6 15:43:48 2009
New Revision: 732179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732179&view=rev
Log:
minor optimization: getCharset(ContentTypeField) no longer calls f.getCharset()
up to three times
Modified:
james/mime4j/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mi
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Jan 6 15:49:02 2009
New Revision: 732183
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=732183&view=rev
Log:
Repackage
Added:
james/protocols/imap/trunk/jpa/src/main/java/org/apache/james/imap/store/Authenticator.java
- copied, changed from r732065,
james/protocols/i
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:56, Megha Agarval wrote:
>
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Megha Agarval wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was using SMTPS and POP3S to send and receive mails successfully with the
>>> phoenix deployment I had downloaded a couple of months back
33 matches
Mail list logo
