Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
unless you change your mind or figure out some other way forward, then
james server will die
i was hopeful that a 3.x would be possible but we're too short of
testers and documentors
a gradualist approach would mean that 2.x users could contribute to
testing and doc
Hello Again (after 3 years), I like +1 OSGi/Felix idea :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Stefano Bagnara"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:10 AM
Subject: [POLL] trunk -=phoenix +=spring/OSGi
Robert think there is no consensus on moving away from phoenix towards
another specific co
I'm not really active at the moment, but I think without moving to
some "newer" container we will not be able to attract any new
committer soon :-/
Just my 2 cents..
So I'm +1 to move to something new..
Bye,
Norman
2009/5/21 David Jencks :
>
> On May 21, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote
On May 21, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert think there is no consensus on moving away from phoenix towards
another specific container.
As I don't remember who is against such a move in trunk I'm starting
this thread.
Is anyone against the removal of phoenix from trunk towards
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 5/21/09, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> Robert think there is no consensus on moving away from phoenix towards
>> another specific container.
>>
>> As I don't remember who is against such a move in trunk I'm starting
>> this thread.
>>
>> Is anyone against the rem
On 5/21/09, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert think there is no consensus on moving away from phoenix towards
> another specific container.
>
> As I don't remember who is against such a move in trunk I'm starting
> this thread.
>
> Is anyone against the removal of phoenix from trunk towards the use
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> everyone knows that i favour factoring out libraries which can be
> reused between 2.x and 3.x but there just isn't consensus support for
> this.
Well. Just try it. I just told you that IMO this is a PITA. If you don't
trust me then just go ahead. I won't veto y
Robert think there is no consensus on moving away from phoenix towards
another specific container.
As I don't remember who is against such a move in trunk I'm starting
this thread.
Is anyone against the removal of phoenix from trunk towards the use of a
spring+OSGi solution (like Felix Karaf, fo
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> The only real features for end users in that roadmap is jSPF and this
> could be released as a mailet anyway. jSPF as it is in trunk cannot be
> done in v2.3 because of different fastfail s
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> David Jencks ha scritto:
>> On May 20, 2009, at 7:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Stefano Bagnar
11 matches
Mail list logo
