Define mailboxfactory bean in server spring xml
---
Key: JAMES-1359
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1359
Project: JAMES Server
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Spring Containe
Author: eric
Date: Wed Jan 4 09:19:11 2012
New Revision: 1227088
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1227088&view=rev
Log:
Define mailboxfatory bean in server spring context (JAMES-1359)
Modified:
james/app/trunk/src/main/resources/META-INF/org/apache/james/spring-server.xml
Modified:
j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Charles resolved JAMES-1359.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in trunk. Can be closed.
> Define mailboxfactory bean in
Thank you for your promt reaction, Eric.
however, after updating the following two are still missing the svn:ignore:
/protocols/trunk/imap/.classpath
/protocols/trunk/imap/.project
Best,
Gazda
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Good catch Gazda, We sometimes leave such smal
Author: eric
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:53:46 2012
New Revision: 1227112
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1227112&view=rev
Log:
Add svn:ignore
Modified:
james/protocols/trunk/imap/ (props changed)
Propchange: james/protocols/trunk/imap/
---
Author: eric
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:58:25 2012
New Revision: 1227115
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1227115&view=rev
Log:
Remove .classpath and .project files from svn
Removed:
james/protocols/trunk/imap/.classpath
james/protocols/trunk/imap/.project
Author: eric
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:59:28 2012
New Revision: 1227116
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1227116&view=rev
Log:
Remove unneeded svn:ignore
Modified:
james/protocols/trunk/imap/ (props changed)
Propchange: james/protocols/trunk/imap/
---
Eric,
thank you for your effort. Everything is as expected after your r1227116.
Best,
Gazda
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jochen Gazda wrote:
> Thank you for your promt reaction, Eric.
>
> however, after updating the following two are still missing the svn:ignore:
>
> /protocols/trunk/imap/
That's Cool :)
Eric
On 04/01/12 12:07, Jochen Gazda wrote:
Eric,
thank you for your effort. Everything is as expected after your r1227116.
Best,
Gazda
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jochen Gazda wrote:
Thank you for your promt reaction, Eric.
however, after updating the following two ar
