Re: Failover Bug with ActiveMQ

2013-01-18 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Philipp, Thx again for you detailed inputs. Yes, 1/ seems promising. With a bit of effort, I'm sure it would even be possible to setup a unit test that launches 2 embedded amq, the first one being stopped after a delay (see [1] for the current unit test). You would also need to configure

[jira] [Created] (MAILBOX-191) more effective implementation of StoreMessageResultIterator

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Kvokacka (JIRA)
Peter Kvokacka created MAILBOX-191: -- Summary: more effective implementation of StoreMessageResultIterator Key: MAILBOX-191 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-191 Project: James

[jira] [Updated] (MAILBOX-191) more effective implementation of StoreMessageResultIterator

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Kvokacka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Peter Kvokacka updated MAILBOX-191: --- Attachment: StoreMessageResultIterator.java more effective implementation of

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-191) more effective implementation of StoreMessageResultIterator

2013-01-18 Thread Peter Kvokacka (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557272#comment-13557272 ] Peter Kvokacka commented on MAILBOX-191: I attached proposed patch.

[jira] [Commented] (MAILBOX-191) more effective implementation of StoreMessageResultIterator

2013-01-18 Thread Eric Charles (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13557300#comment-13557300 ] Eric Charles commented on MAILBOX-191: -- Hi Peter, I will further look at you patch.