Re: JMAP protocol: Implementing RFC-8620 & RFC-8621

2019-09-15 Thread Antoine Duprat
Hi Benoit, Seems great to me: don't break existing things. Don't you want to introduce a new endpoint for jmao-draft. That way with versions of the protocole might be bringed by the same product, and you let the choice of the client to use what endpoint he wants. An other point is about the name

[jira] [Closed] (JAMES-2882) Document IMAP delegation using administratorId property.

2019-09-15 Thread Tellier Benoit (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tellier Benoit closed JAMES-2882. - Fix Version/s: 3.5.0 Resolution: Fixed https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/2689

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-2865) Implementing a MockSmtpServer

2019-09-15 Thread Tellier Benoit (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16930227#comment-16930227 ] Tellier Benoit commented on JAMES-2865: --- https://github.com/linagora/james-project/

[jira] [Closed] (JAMES-2883) SearchIndex should not attempt to read a deleted mailbox

2019-09-15 Thread Tellier Benoit (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tellier Benoit closed JAMES-2883. - > SearchIndex should not attempt to read a deleted mailbox >

[jira] [Resolved] (JAMES-2883) SearchIndex should not attempt to read a deleted mailbox

2019-09-15 Thread Tellier Benoit (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tellier Benoit resolved JAMES-2883. --- Fix Version/s: 3.5.0 Resolution: Fixed https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/

[james-project] 04/04: JAMES-2865 Use behavior builder directly in tests

2019-09-15 Thread btellier
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btellier pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git commit d0922c47283c4e2ffb78af1922a590a1174dd93f Author: Benoit Tellier AuthorDate: Fri Sep 6 09:47:27 2019 +0700

[james-project] 03/04: JAMES-2865 Enhance behaviors builder

2019-09-15 Thread btellier
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btellier pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git commit 1769a9aac47108cd95a8b998112dbf9643cdb6b2 Author: Benoit Tellier AuthorDate: Fri Sep 6 09:44:17 2019 +0700

[james-project] 01/04: JAMES-2883 SearchIndex should not attempt to read a deleted mailbox

2019-09-15 Thread btellier
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btellier pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git commit d91ce3dbbe003c83c924510d0b210be75c1b0eb9 Author: Benoit Tellier AuthorDate: Fri Sep 13 16:18:47 2019 +0700

[james-project] 02/04: JAMES-2882 Add an example for administratorId usage

2019-09-15 Thread btellier
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btellier pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git commit 4a71948714e16191f7b77bea7d8b00457693d37c Author: Benoit Tellier AuthorDate: Fri Sep 13 14:43:33 2019 +0700

[james-project] branch master updated (b8b6354 -> d0922c4)

2019-09-15 Thread btellier
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btellier pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git. from b8b6354 JAMES-2813 Add MappingsSourcesMigrationTask.AdditionalInformation serialization new d91ce3d

Re: JMAP protocol: Implementing RFC-8620 & RFC-8621

2019-09-15 Thread rcordier
Hi, I agree to move forward with this. Rene. Sep 16, 2019, 10:19 by btell...@apache.org: > Hello all, > > @cketti mentioned his interest for helping updating our JMAP > implementation to final RFCs. > > We should be careful not breaking things for existing James clients > using the deprecated/

JMAP protocol: Implementing RFC-8620 & RFC-8621

2019-09-15 Thread Tellier Benoit
Hello all, @cketti mentioned his interest for helping updating our JMAP implementation to final RFCs. We should be careful not breaking things for existing James clients using the deprecated/outdated JMAP specification. Maybe the best thing would be to expose the final JMAP spec on an other port

[jira] [Commented] (JSIEVE-112) Use SLF4J & logback for logging

2019-09-15 Thread Rene Cordier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16930198#comment-16930198 ] Rene Cordier commented on JSIEVE-112: - PR was : https://github.com/apache/james-jsiev

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-2884) Update JMAP implementation to conform to RFC 8620/8621

2019-09-15 Thread cketti (Jira)
cketti created JAMES-2884: - Summary: Update JMAP implementation to conform to RFC 8620/8621 Key: JAMES-2884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2884 Project: James Server Issue Type: Imp