ver/3/dev_build.html
- http://james.apache.org/server/3/dev_extend.html
Tks,
Eric
On 23/10/2010 17:47, Simon Funnell wrote:
The last time I commented on such things I went a little wild and
spewed a bit too much. I will keep it more succinct this time but it
is worth saying.
I think the
very nice if you select
a vibrant color.
Kind Regards... Dhrubo
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Simon Funnell
wrote:
I probably couldn't do much better than the one submitted, I could change
the colours and remove the feathers (and also provide the source files
with
any disclaimers or
Have been playing with colour variations and think I have some results:
http://propositum.biz/james.html
I prefer the green one myself, gives a sense of fluid ecology/economics.
The tag line font is Lucida Sans Type/Console.
I can do a polish job and provide the necessary source/formats if giv
On 23/10/10 12:54, Eric Charles (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12924181#action_12924181
]
Eric Charles commented on JAMES-1074:
-
H
for a
specific colour/colours I will do my best to oblige.
Regards,
Simon
On 17/10/10 13:18, Dhrubo wrote:
Simon,
You have done an excellent job. It will be very nice if you
select a vibrant color.
Kind Regards... Dhrubo
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Simon Funnell
I did a logo for fun here:
http://propositum.biz/james.html
Unfortunately the font also costs about the same:
http://www.linotype.com/487329/bumblebeeonthemoon-font.html
I don't know the full implications of licensing arrangements but you are
welcome to have/use/[appropriate legal definition]
06:55, Dhrubo wrote:
Can we make this log simpler please.
- dhrubo
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi Simon,
Tks for the proposal.
So, probably we should launch a contest for a new logo :)
Eric
On 16/10/2010 18:47, Simon Funnell wrote:
I did a logo for fun
I did a logo for fun here:
http://propositum.biz/james.html
Unfortunately the font also costs about the same:
http://www.linotype.com/487329/bumblebeeonthemoon-font.html
I don't know the full implications of licensing arrangements but you are
welcome to have/use/[appropriate legal definition]
Ok, I can continue with what I am doing for version 3, what I am doing
is fairly useful regardless. I will try to relate the concepts to the
code base in the documentation as I come to understand it more.
Thanks,
Simon
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
2009/11/26 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
Thanks, I
I will lookin into
replace phoenix with osgi as proof-of-concept for using OSGI.
Bye,
Norman
2009/11/25 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
I've been working on a few wiki pages and feel as if I am at a juncture.
I've been looking at the version 3 code base (rather than version 2...) and
getting a
Hi,
I thought I would let people know a little about me, I am heavily
influenced by open source principles however my inexperience of open
source development politics in practice means I am floating a little. I
am available for the next six weeks so can, and want to, work on James
full time,
Hi,
I am getting an error on this page -
http://wiki.apache.org/james/JamesServices. This occurred after I
renamed the JamesServices page to JamesUserServices. I can stop this
from happening again by leaving the page name the same and moving the
content, which is not difficult. Unfortunately
Hi,
I've been working on a few wiki pages and feel as if I am at a juncture.
I've been looking at the version 3 code base (rather than version 2...)
and getting a better idea of the big picture. I would like to expand the
documentation further but would like some feedback as to whether they
a
Hi,
I have assumed people are busy and will supply me guidance on the
documentation effort soon, thanks. If I failed to make it clear in
previous mails, I am prepared to put myself into service for the next
six weeks to assist with the growth of the James project. At present, I
feel the best
at present, that can come later.
Regards,
Simon
Stefano
2009/11/21 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
Sorry, I will keep it under 'Solution' for now.
Norman Maurer wrote:
Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part of the
"main code". And why is this any bett
Hi,
Sorry, I will keep it under 'Solution' for now.
Norman Maurer wrote:
Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part of
the "main code". And why is this any better then injecting the Logger
like every other object. In trunk we even use JSR250 for that so every
Franew
Hi,
Aspectj is an example of how you could add logging to James components
later in the inheritance chain. Tools already exist, all you need to do
is accept this simple fact. If components have explicit logging
operations, they are flawed. Nothing do with me or anyone, its a just a
fact. The
nd it.
I am prepared to put my framework aside for the moment and contribute
documentation to James. This will help me to learn more about the
specifics of James and having a broader view of the current James
architecture (I can do diagrams) will be useful to everyone. In this way
I can add
Hi,
I've been studying the code base and evaluating which approach is the
best to take. At present, I will try to clarify the framework
architecture I am using as 'evangelising' might actually be quite
effective. Firstly, there is nothing new to learn, the architecture is
exactly the same as
ass loading, component isolation,
componentreloading, deployment) or application assembly (dependency
injection, component configuration, service discovery/linking,
configuration)?
Stefano
2009/11/18 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
By the way, its only 'my' framework by virtue of the fact
(class loading, component isolation,
componentreloading, deployment) or application assembly (dependency
injection, component configuration, service discovery/linking,
configuration)?
Stefano
2009/11/18 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
By the way, its only 'my' framework by virtue of the fact there is no
Hi,
This is a summary of the differences between Spring and Guice
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/SpringComparison
From it: 'From our experience, most AOP frameworks are too powerful for
most uses and don't carry their own conceptual weight. Guice builds
method interception in at
Java community, like Guice
or Spring.
Eric MacAdie
Pronounced: muh-KAY-dee
Simon Funnell wrote:
Hi,
By the way, its only 'my' framework by virtue of the fact there is no
'our' to refer to. I could probably refer to it as 'the' framework
with you being able t
Hi,
By the way, its only 'my' framework by virtue of the fact there is no
'our' to refer to. I could probably refer to it as 'the' framework with
you being able to infer what I am referring to from experience, but its
actually called 'Platformed' and I intend to make it open source. Also,
aft
Hi,
Thanks for the comments. I realise that what I am pointing out is not
straight forward, but I think I do have some insight in how to achieve
it. If I am really honest the current object orientated paradigm is
flawed and this flaw propagates to all software based on certain
principles espo
y lookin at karaf
(http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-karaf.html). Not sure if
this is really the way to go.
So any feedback / sugguestions are really welcome, and feel free to
ask more questions :)
Bye,
Norman
2009/11/15 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
I've been using James for a couple of
Hi,
I've been using James for a couple of years now and enjoy the service it
provides, I actually use quite a few things from the Jakarta project.
With the development of version 3 I have become interested in
integrating James with an existing server framework I have been
developing. On the w
gt;
To: "James Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: Innodb better?
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Funnell wrote:
>
> >In the case of hardware failure, no database on this planet can
'guarantee'
> >there will be no corruption, if you ha
inal Message -
From: "Joe Cheng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:45 AM
Subject: Re: Innodb better?
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Funnell wrote:
>
> >In the case of hardware failure, no database on this planet can
&
In the case of hardware failure, no database on this planet can 'guarantee'
there will be no corruption, if you have a single point of failure, and it
fails, everything fails, hence the term single as opposed to many points of
failure.
One of the most important things about software design, in any
Use of CDI 'only' limits a component to certain types of containers, for
example components with getter/setters patterns can have their dependencies
changed at runtime, I believe CDI limits a components reuse in other
projects.
A container should ideally be able to use any component by supporting
31 matches
Mail list logo