processors in use are much more stable than the
mailets that may be desired within the processor.
In writing this I am also starting to think that hot-deployment is
less the issue than the modularity of deployment.
On 22/12/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/12/2007, Rober
On 20/12/2007, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 5:33 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I could just use some pointers on how to dynamically register a new Mailet
> > > onto a JAMES server via Java code if thats possible. e.g. I was thinking a
The original and simple idea of using JMS as a means to inject Mail
into James' processors seems good to me, it would open up James to the
JEE audience. I was about to embark on the exact same experiment, so
thanks Robert.
The source of the message can be the James SMTP service, Fetchmail or
any n
this forward I will try and refresh my
> memory a little more.
>
> Cheers
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Tim Stephenson
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone ever asked for or considered allowing more than one matcher
per mailet?
I have a situation where i want to say something like 'if the
recipient is x and the subject is y'. There are matchers for recipient
and subject but i want to combine them.
I could do this (I think) by have the fir
article.tss?l=J2EE1_4
>
> With this example you can receive emails thru a JMS message on a method like :
>
> public void onMessage(javax.mail.Message message)
>
> Isn't life simple ? ;-)
>
> Anyway, that is just some late night toughts.
>
> Rgs,
> JB
>
> -
