Re: jDKIM as a new James product

Stefano, This sounds like excellent news! I remember that my implementation of DomainKeys couldn't be packaged with James due to the Apache foundation's concerns over the licensing of the DK spec. Is it possible that DKIM is encumbered in the same way? If so, what are the options for releasing j

Re: DKIM library / mailet

all, >> >> I hope to find soon the time to work on DKIM for JAMES. >> I'll start reviewing Tom Brown code at >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752 > > cool > >> 1) The code is 2 years old and has no license headers. The author >> granted r

DomainKeys - Can the code finally be added to the distribution?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-22 Can someone who is wiser than me tell me if that's the resolution of that JIRA issue? Tom Brown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-ma

Re: ActiveMQ

Here is another use case I think would be valuable: 3. As SMTP-to-JMS bridge (reverse of #1) a. JAMES receives mail b. JAMES publishes mail to specific JMS queue or topic c. mail is processed/stored/whatever by any interested listeners Tom On 11/29/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: Domain Keys (Was: jSPF and James?)

Thanks! Tom On 6/5/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thx Graig :-) bye Norman Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 15:29 +0200 schrieb Craig Raw: > Hi Stefano, > > No problem, it's now in http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752 > > Craig > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > Craig Raw ha s

DomainKeys license followup

ation license? Is there much hope of having it included directly, or would JAMES be best served by having this DK implementation released under the GPL...? Thanks again! Tom Brown - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: Domain Keys (Was: jSPF and James?)

hp Tom On 12/31/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Brown wrote: > I have submitted the code via JIRA. I believe it's issue #12359570. > > Tom First of all, thank you! It's always cool to receive code contributions! I gave the code a really fast review

Re: Domain Keys (Was: jSPF and James?)

bye Norman Tom Brown schrieb: > Some of this conversation is difficult to follow as I don't know who's > who. However, it seems that the current consensus is to attach the > current source it as a JIRA issue and go from there... Is a CLA > required for to submit the issue, o

[jira] Updated: (JAMES-752) DomainKeys mailet for JAMES

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752?page=all ] Tom Brown updated JAMES-752: Attachment: domainkeys-src.zip This is the java src directory containing the implementation of domain keys. > DomainKeys mailet for JA

[jira] Created: (JAMES-752) DomainKeys mailet for JAMES

DomainKeys mailet for JAMES --- Key: JAMES-752 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752 Project: James Issue Type: New Feature Components: Mailet Contributions Reporter: Tom Brown

Re: Domain Keys (Was: jSPF and James?)

Some of this conversation is difficult to follow as I don't know who's who. However, it seems that the current consensus is to attach the current source it as a JIRA issue and go from there... Is a CLA required for to submit the issue, or does that only become necessary when it's time to commit th

Re: Domain Keys (Was: jSPF and James?)

dvise as to how I should continue... I'm new to this, so if I have incorrectly moved this DomainKeys issue to the server developers list, let me know. Thanks again! Tom On 12/22/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Brown wrote: > Hi Guys! > > I just t