Noel J. Bergman wrote:
See: Runtime.runFinalizersOnExit(). There is no guarantee that finalizers
will be called, unless you use that deprecated and unreliable method.
Thanks for that, not noticed that before, or have since forgotten ;) It
certainly seems like there is a bit of a gap in the spec
One correction... you are not guaranteed that a finalizer will get called.
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtctips/j-jtc0319a.html
Thanks for that, interesting stuff. If I read it correctly though they
seem to be saying that objects aren't guaranteed to be garbage
collecte
reasonable
implementation would do this. Too expectant?
Obviously if you have expensive resources tied up you probably want to
guarantee that they get released in a much more timely fashion ;)
Cheers
Kerr
--
Kerr Rainey - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.
I'm simplifying something
and there is something I'm missing, please let me know.
Cheers
Kerr
--
Kerr Rainey - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.rokera.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Funnily enough I am right in the middle of configuring jwma - knew there had
to be something!
A bit offtopic, but have you seen http://jwma.sourceforge.net/ ?
Given that JWMA doesn't support POP3 what's the state of IMAP in James
at the moment?
Cheers
Kerr
--
