Re: [MIME4J] Thread-Safe

Norman Maurer wrote: > Niklas Therning schrieb: > >> Norman Maurer wrote: >> >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> after using mime4j a little bit to implement some actions which should >>> get taken for specific message parts I'm a little bit "unhappy" with it... >>> Its ok for using in a single Thre

Re: [MIME4J] Thread-Safe

Niklas Therning schrieb: > Norman Maurer wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> after using mime4j a little bit to implement some actions which should >> get taken for specific message parts I'm a little bit "unhappy" with it... >> Its ok for using in a single Thread programm, but with using multiply >> Thr

Re: [MIME4J] Thread-Safe

Norman Maurer wrote: > Hi guys, > > after using mime4j a little bit to implement some actions which should > get taken for specific message parts I'm a little bit "unhappy" with it... > Its ok for using in a single Thread programm, but with using multiply > Threads its not really "good". For exampl

[MIME4J] Thread-Safe

Hi guys, after using mime4j a little bit to implement some actions which should get taken for specific message parts I'm a little bit "unhappy" with it... Its ok for using in a single Thread programm, but with using multiply Threads its not really "good". For example i have to use one MimeStreamPa