This vote has passed with 8 +1's and no -1s
I will be in touch to get opinions about the best way to break the code out.
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better Cast my own vote ;-)
+1
On 1/8/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects James server.
Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
expressed in this thread
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mo
Danny Angus wrote:
one step at a time... we've talked
about this for so long it might be a mistake to bite off too much in
the first go.
+1
It is much better a small concrete step today than a hundred of
discussion in the last years :-)
Stefano
-
On 1/10/07, Serge Knystautas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1.
I'd also think about moving our mailets into the mailet subproject,
and that could serve as your testing ground or at least samples. At
least the mailets that are not tied to James/Avalon APIs.
I thought about that, having a /contrib
+1.
I'd also think about moving our mailets into the mailet subproject,
and that could serve as your testing ground or at least samples. At
least the mailets that are not tied to James/Avalon APIs.
--
Serge Knystautas
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.65
+1
On 1/8/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects James server.
Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
expressed in this thread
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-general/200610.m
Am Montag, den 08.01.2007, 09:58 + schrieb Danny Angus:
> I would like to propose that the Mailet API be migrated into a new
> sub-project with all its mail on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and its svn in
> james/mailetapi
+1 (non binding)
I think it is important to show the public that james community
On 1/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you propose to create a new JIRA project, too?
Oh yeah, makes sense to I think.
We could even make a standalone release from that release (so current
projects using mailet apis can already use that) and add it as a
dependency in james
+1
Norman
Danny Angus schrieb:
> Hi,
> I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects
> James server.
>
> Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
> expressed in this thread
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-general/200610.mbox/[EMAIL
On 1/8/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects James server.
Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
expressed in this thread
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-general/200610.mbox/
+1 Stefano
PS: see the inline note.
Danny Angus wrote:
Hi,
I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects James
server.
Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
expressed in this thread
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-general/200
Hi,
I'm calling this vote here and not on general@ because it affects James server.
Because of interest in advancing the Mailet API and opinions already
expressed in this thread
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/james-general/200610.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
I would like to propose that t
12 matches
Mail list logo