Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-02-03 Thread Eric Charles
You can read more on http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html (PMC stands for 'Project Management Committee' - If you contribute code, you can be invited to become committer, and after to become part of the PMC) Thx, Eric On 03/02/12 15:07, Norman Maurer wrote: Non-binding means that you

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-02-03 Thread Norman Maurer
Non-binding means that you are not in the James PMC. A vote needs to have at least 3 +1 from binding persons to pass. Bye, Norman 2012/2/3 lclhst : > Non-binding? What does it mean? That I'm not an official Apache JAMES > Developer? > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Norman Maurer > wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-02-03 Thread lclhst
Non-binding? What does it mean? That I'm not an official Apache JAMES Developer? On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > Hi there, > > the VOTE passed: > > +1 Eric, Stefano, Felix, Norman, lclhst(*) > > * Non-Binding > > I will take care of upload the artifacts. > > Thanks, > Norma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-02-03 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi there, the VOTE passed: +1 Eric, Stefano, Felix, Norman, lclhst(*) * Non-Binding I will take care of upload the artifacts. Thanks, Norman 2012/1/29 Norman Maurer : > Hi there, > > I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James > Protocols later the week. So I think we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-30 Thread Felix Knecht
[X] +1 Please release Thanks Felix - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-30 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2012/1/29 Norman Maurer : > Hi there, > > I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James > Protocols later the week. So I think we should release one more > version of Apache James Protocols now, as we had some improvements > till the last release. You know... release often, rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-30 Thread lclhst
+1 please release, let's move it all forward. On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > [x] +1 Please release > > Bye, > Norman > > 2012/1/29 Norman Maurer : > > Hi there, > > > > I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James > > Protocols later the week. So I t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-30 Thread Norman Maurer
[x] +1 Please release Bye, Norman 2012/1/29 Norman Maurer : > Hi there, > > I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James > Protocols later the week. So I think we should release one more > version of Apache James Protocols now, as we had some improvements > till the last rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-30 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Please release Eric On 29/01/12 14:22, Norman Maurer wrote: Hi there, I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James Protocols later the week. So I think we should release one more version of Apache James Protocols now, as we had some improvements till the last relea

[VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.2

2012-01-29 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi there, I want to start to integrate the imap code base into Apache James Protocols later the week. So I think we should release one more version of Apache James Protocols now, as we had some improvements till the last release. You know... release often, release early. So please cast your VOTE: