Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> it's better to use a PROPOSAL or a POLL and then moved gradually >> trying to carry the community with me (or at least as many who wanted >> to come along), or just invoked Rules For

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: it's better to use a PROPOSAL or a POLL and then moved gradually trying to carry the community with me (or at least as many who wanted to come along), or just invoked Rules For Revolutionaries and forked Done. Just wrote a PROPOSAL. How much should I wait befor

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. It took half an hour to

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On 7/29/08, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. >>> It took half an hour to prepare the modules and r

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 14:09 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. > > It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descr

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descriptor so to have 2 modules correctly managed

Re: [jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. > It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descriptor > so to have 2 modules correctly managed by m2 but it already took a lot

[jSPF] cost of supporting offline builds

As you know I'm working on a branch to make jSPF a multimodule product. It took half an hour to prepare the modules and refactor the m2 descriptor so to have 2 modules correctly managed by m2 but it already took a lot of hours trying to make it build while offline. The "stage module" hack is t