[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-310?page=comments#action_12362614 ]
Danny Angus commented on JAMES-310:
---
If the users requirement can be met by the software as is at best its a
documentation issue.
I say close this defect.
> Redirect mailet
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-310?page=comments#action_12362315 ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini commented on JAMES-310:
-
I still believe that the right behaviour is the current one.
To get the behaviour expected by the reporter bo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-310?page=comments#action_12361649 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-310:
---
I don't use this mailet often but maybe the Resend mailet can do what the
reporter asked.
Resend is much more flexible than Redir
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-310?page=comments#action_12361646 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-310:
---
I believe that I agree, but we should also document a configuration that can
provide the behavior expected by the reporter.
> Re
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-310?page=comments#action_12361617 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-310:
---
I would like to close this for 2.3.0: any update on the comments?
The 2.2.0 behaviour seems to be more correct, to me.
I will clos
You are right, in cvs it is as you say, but the comments refer to message *body*.
That's why I made it differently.
We have now to decide what to do. I would leave it as it is now, as it can be a correct interpretation (inline=body), and as any behaviour
is obtainable through the parameters, but
> as the parameter refers to the message body, perhaps we should
instead consider the 2.1.x behaviour a bug, and 2.2.0 correct.
As far as the original intention of Redirect is concerned "inline
unaltered" I think I meant that it should not alter the message in any way,
headers included not just
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Created: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 6:01 AM
Body:
The "bug" is in the management of unaltered: in this case in 2.1.3
the To: header was left unchanged (even if was specified), instead now (if
is missing
