[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12435204 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-424:
-
The Change put the text in the body if there are no valid headers. So this
seems to be the same as Scott Carr reports
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12435219 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-424:
---
2 comments:
1. Sendmail seems to apply a more intelligent algorithm: it read the mail and
use every line as an
Noel J. Bergman (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434868 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-424:
---
as you keep saying this is a problem in Javamail (and I could agree)
Keep it in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434748 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-424:
---
I just talked with Norman about this and the problem seems to be that we pass
the stream to javamail and javamail
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434755 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-424:
---
Personally, I would mark this as INVALID / WONT FIX. The data is out of
compliance with RFC 2822, and according to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434761 ]
Scott Carr commented on JAMES-424:
--
I agree it is INVALID data, so setting to 'Won't Fix' will not hurt my feelings.
I did try this with PostFix and Exchange and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434772 ]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-424:
-
Well i never see this behavior except in james. So i think fixin it will be
good. If we fix it we should do it in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434779 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-424:
---
RFC 2821 says, in part:
Server SMTP systems SHOULD NOT reject messages based on perceived
defects in the RFC
Right, but using MIME4J whould be a big rewrite! And at the moment
MIME4J only supports reading not writing if im not wrong.
bye
Norman
Noel J. Bergman (JIRA) schrieb:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434779 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434784 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-424:
---
Sendmail do exactly what PostFix and Exchange did.
I just tested sending this message
---
Right, but using MIME4J whould be a big rewrite! And at the moment
MIME4J only supports reading not writing if im not wrong.
Correct on both counts. But if we restrict the use of JavaMail to when we only
really want to manipulate the contents, we will be better off. Most of the
time, we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434788 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-424:
---
Further considerations.
rfc2822 definition of a message:
-
A message consists of header fields
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12434868 ]
Noel J. Bergman commented on JAMES-424:
---
as you keep saying this is a problem in Javamail (and I could agree)
Keep it in context. It is a problem with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-424?page=comments#action_12331791 ]
Danny Angus commented on JAMES-424:
---
is the test text supposed to be preceded by CRLFCRLF?
If so it is possibly a bug in Java mail or James might be trimming the leading
14 matches
Mail list logo
