[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437191 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-596:
-
JAMES-525 also covers OpenPGP
Reorganize SMIME crypto support code to share it with future new PGP
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437192 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-596:
-
Classic inline PGP is known to be a tough problem. There are known issues with
parsing messages and with
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437195 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-596:
-
I assume that the right approach to the generation of the new MimeBodyPart
content is to register
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437208 ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini commented on JAMES-596:
-
I would return for getSignerCN() the primary name of the PGP key;
for
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437209 ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini commented on JAMES-596:
-
Regarding your proposal of adding only RFC 3156 OpenPGP/MIME support, I leave
it to your
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437211 ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini commented on JAMES-596:
-
About the right approach to the generation of the new MimeBodyPart content, I'm
unable to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12437231 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-596:
-
OpenPGP/MIME and inline PGP are very different approaches to the problem. An
OpenPGP/MIME message
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-596?page=comments#action_12436625 ]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on JAMES-596:
-
KeyHolder contains properties
public String getSignerDistinguishedName();
public String
