Markus Wiederkehr wrote:
I think I have found a minor(?) issue when parsing header fields.
RFC 822 defines a field as:
field = field-name ":" [ field-body ] CRLF
field-name = 1*
.. which implies two things. First a field name must consist of at
least one character. And second
I think I have found a minor(?) issue when parsing header fields.
RFC 822 defines a field as:
field = field-name ":" [ field-body ] CRLF
field-name = 1*
.. which implies two things. First a field name must consist of at
least one character. And second a field name may not conta
