On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMA
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we have these packages in user-api:
o.a.j.vut
o.a.j.api.user
o.a.j.ser
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> we have these packages in user-api:
>>> o.a.j.vut
>>> o.a.j.api.user
>>> o.a.j.services
>>>
>>> th
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
user-api and user-library seems almost ok as modules, but I feel the
packages are wrong.
+1
Is this something concerning also other developers or it's me too much
strict wrt packages
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> user-api and user-library seems almost ok as modules, but I feel the
> packages are wrong.
+1
> Is this something concerning also other developers or it's me too much
> strict wrt packages/dependencies and this stuff?
user-api and user-library seems almost ok as modules, but I feel the
packages are wrong.
Is this something concerning also other developers or it's me too much
strict wrt packages/dependencies and this stuff?
we have these packages in user-api:
o.a.j.vut
o.a.j.api.user
o.a.j.services
then we
