Le 09/12/2020 à 12:58, Jean Helou a écrit :
> > Also for ACLs isn't eventual consistency acceptable ?
>
>
>> My take is that it is. My first shot was to do just that.
>>
>> Howver the current code enforces a "transaction like" behavior, with an
>> ACLDiff fired on the mailbox event system.
I'll answer other threads separately.
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3468 about this.
I asked Quan, our intern, to take a look.
Regards,
Benoit Tellier
Le 09/12/2020 à 12:58, Jean Helou a écrit :
>>> So from a user perspective adding a user would always succeed. But
> > So from a user perspective adding a user would always succeed. But would
> it
> > succeed by doing nothing (the current behaviour in silencing the
> > AlreadyExist exception) or would it succeed by effectively overwriting
> the
> > user (in a last write wins manner) ?
>
> Webadmin so far
Sorry for repost,
I sent that response before but it was lost.
Maybe the unfamous text/html format issue.
Le 07/12/2020 à 04:33, Jean Helou a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
>> James server.
>>
>
> I have some concerns but i feel
On Sun, 2020-12-06 at 22:33 +0100, Jean Helou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the
> Distributed
> > James server.
> >
>
> I have some concerns but i feel imposterish for posting them as they
> most
> likely come from my own lack of knowledge, i'll
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 10:12 +0700, Tellier Benoit wrote:
> Hello Matthieu,
>
> Sadly, I'm unable to see what you did write in the email you sent due
> to
> the absence of quote.
>
> Can you review your email client settings, in order to get a readable
> output we can start discussing on?
>
>
Hello Matthieu,
Sadly, I'm unable to see what you did write in the email you sent due to
the absence of quote.
Can you review your email client settings, in order to get a readable
output we can start discussing on?
This time, I made the effort, but I would greatly appreciate a better
display.
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:22 +0700, btell...@linagora.com (OpenPaaS) wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
James server.
As such, I'm pocking around for improvement areas and found a huge
topic
around LWT.
My conclusions so far are that we
Hello,
I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
> James server.
>
I have some concerns but i feel imposterish for posting them as they most
likely come from my own lack of knowledge, i'll still try just in case some
of points are valid :)
- `users` we rely on LWT
This ADR can also be reviewed on Github:
https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/271
Le 04/12/2020 à 14:22, btell...@linagora.com (OpenPaaS) a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
> James server.
>
> As such, I'm pocking around for
Hi,
I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
James server.
As such, I'm pocking around for improvement areas and found a huge topic
around LWT.
My conclusions so far are that we should keep LWT and SERIAL consistency
level out of the most common use cases.
I know
11 matches
Mail list logo
