robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
the idea is that the new modules are generated by the task including
build files. the build.xml in each generated module will import the
general macros and targets from standard builds in build. it should be
minimal.
builds should have reasonable document and de
On 3/21/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
> this is the first step towards modularisation of the server code. the
> plan is to split the current code base into a number of modules in
> subdirectories.
>
> the modular build scripts are mostly done. sh
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
this is the first step towards modularisation of the server code. the
plan is to split the current code base into a number of modules in
subdirectories.
the modular build scripts are mostly done. should be able to tidy them
up and commit them this weekend.
I j
On 3/11/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
are in the directory org.apache.james. good enough?
Yes, until I get my a*** in gear and do the mailet move.
BTW Sorry that's late in coming, I've been up to here ^ with all kinds of stuff.
d.
-
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I really like subant. Perhaps we can get back to using it, and
eliminate the Maven ... er ... "stuff" ... that has crept into JAMES.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > The automated build processes only use dist/james-${version}/downloads,
> > which holds the various release packages. The rest of the directory
> > structure is an unpackaged build for phoenix.
> i always f
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > The automated build processes only use dist/james-${version}/downloads,
> > which holds the various release packages. The rest of the directory
> > structure is an unpackaged build for phoenix.
> i always found that structure a little confusing but maybe that's j
On 3/10/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
> robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
>> unless there are any objections, i'll alter the pheonix-deployment
>> module to use a first level directory for distributions
>>
>> - robert
>
> I don't understand the last se
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the plan is for a gradual breaking out to reduce impact on development
That's fine. So long as `ant ${target}` works from the root of trunk, and
the dist/ directory is populated with the packaged release,
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
unless there are any objections, i'll alter the pheonix-deployment
module to use a first level directory for distributions
- robert
I don't understand the last sentence: can you explain?
Ok, Noel answer to the same message gave m
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the issue only arose because that i wasn't well enough to review and
> commit my changes in a timely fashion
Fair enough.
> the plan is for a gradual breaking out to reduce impact on development
That's fine. So long as `ant ${target}` works from the root of trunk
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
the plan is for a gradual breaking out to reduce impact on development
unless there are any objections, i'll alter the pheonix-deployment
module to use a first level directory for distributions
- robert
I don't understand the last sentence: can you explain?
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Stefano wrote:
> > The current move from trunk to trunk/phoenix-deployment (if I understood
> > him correctly) is only a temporary move
Should have been done in a branch to minimize impact during the re-or
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> Stefano wrote:
> > I agree on mime4j, server, jsieve, postage, jspf needing a ttb structure
> +1
OK, so let's move past this, since we all agree, and focus on the actual
discussion.
> > I think Robert proposed to change only the server folder to split its
> > conten
On 3/10/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree on mime4j, server, jsieve, postage, jspf needing a ttb structure
as they follow totally separate workflows, they use different build
mechanisms and they are standalone libraries/products.
+1
I think Robert proposed to change only
I agree on mime4j, server, jsieve, postage, jspf needing a ttb structure
as they follow totally separate workflows, they use different build
mechanisms and they are standalone libraries/products.
I think Robert proposed to change only the server folder to split its
content into multiple subpro
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
>> HUH?! If it is trunk it should be called trunk. If it is so
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
HUH?! If it is trunk it should be called trunk. If it is some branch it
does NOT belong under
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
>
> Needless to say, the nightly builds reflect nothing that's been done since
> this was done to trunk.
> judging
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
Needless to say, the nightly builds reflect nothing that's been done since
this was done to
On 3/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
HUH?! If it is trunk it should be called trunk. If it is some br
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
Needless to say, the nightly builds reflect nothing that's been done since
this was done to trunk.
--- Noel
-
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
HUH?! If it is trunk it should be called trunk. If it is some branch it
does NOT belong under trunk. The SVN conventions
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/ has been moved to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/pheonix-deployment/
developers will need to change their local copies to this new
location. if you have changes then please remember to take a copy
before trying to switch. svn
24 matches
Mail list logo
