Re: Build question

2009-06-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: >>> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred >>> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3? >> >>

Re: Build question

2009-06-12 Thread Norman Maurer
LOL, +1. Norman 2009/6/12 Bernd Fondermann : > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: >>> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred >>> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3? >> >> a controv

Re: Build question

2009-06-12 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: >> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred >> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3? > > a controversial question so i'll try to explain the consensus

Re: Build question

2009-06-09 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: > How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred > build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3? a controversial question so i'll try to explain the consensus as i see it (hopefully anyone who dis

Build question

2009-06-09 Thread Eric MacAdie
How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3? Eric MacAdie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For a