On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
>>> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred
>>> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3?
>>
>>
LOL, +1.
Norman
2009/6/12 Bernd Fondermann :
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
>>> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred
>>> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3?
>>
>> a controv
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
>> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred
>> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3?
>
> a controversial question so i'll try to explain the consensus
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the preferred
> build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another for 3?
a controversial question so i'll try to explain the consensus as i see
it (hopefully anyone who dis
How will James be built going forward? Will Maven or Ant be the
preferred build tool? Will one be used for maintaining 2.X and another
for 3?
Eric MacAdie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For a