Re: Configuration API

2006-09-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman wrote: So I would move to use Jakarta Commons Configuration for JAMES, rather than the Avalon configuration, for both JAMES and the Mailet API (caveat: Danny suggests that we have our own, similar, configuration API in Mailet, and use Commons Configuration for the implementation

Re: Configuration API

2006-08-31 Thread Norman Maurer
e Mailet API (caveat: Danny > > suggests that we have our own, similar, configuration API in Mailet, and use > > Commons Configuration for the implementation). That was already on the > > Avalon roadmap before the projected imploded. > > +1 > +1 Norman signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: Configuration API

2006-08-30 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On 8/30/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So I would move to use Jakarta Commons Configuration for JAMES, rather than the Avalon configuration, for both JAMES and the Mailet API (caveat: Danny suggests that we have our own, similar, configuration API in Mailet, and use C

Configuration API

2006-08-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
ns Configuration for JAMES, rather than the Avalon configuration, for both JAMES and the Mailet API (caveat: Danny suggests that we have our own, similar, configuration API in Mailet, and use Commons Configuration for the implementation). That was already on the Avalon roadmap before th