Hi Guys,
maybe some of you had noticed in JIRA that i opened a task about move
BayesianFilter stuff to an extra subproject some time ago. Even if i not
thing i will have time to work in it before completing the
handlerapi-experiment i want to collect some other opions about that.
Anyone agai
My take would be that if we see that the Bayesian code becomes too big
within the host project (Server) we could still factor it into its
own subproject. From recent subprojects (mimej, jSPF, Postage) we see
that they have a tendency to be only maintained by very few committers
and thus lack comm
Wel my idea why i want to move it into a subproject was that maybe some
developer whould find it very usefull to just use a framework for
getting a bayesian filter integrate with their software. I think most of
developer don't need a full mailserver like james. Thats only my point
of view..
A
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
My take would be that if we see that the Bayesian code becomes too big
within the host project (Server) we could still factor it into its
own subproject. From recent subprojects (mimej, jSPF, Postage) we see
that they have a tendency to be only maintained by very few comm
Norman Maurer wrote:
Wel my idea why i want to move it into a subproject was that maybe some
developer whould find it very usefull to just use a framework for
getting a bayesian filter integrate with their software. I think most of
developer don't need a full mailserver like james. Thats only m
On 12/2/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wel my idea why i want to move it into a subproject was that maybe some
developer whould find it very usefull to just use a framework for
getting a bayesian filter integrate with their software. I think most of
developer don't need a full mails
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
> > Wel my idea why i want to move it into a subproject was
> that maybe some
> > developer whould find it very usefull to just use a framework for
> > getting a bayesian filter integrate with their software. I
> think most of
> > developer don't need
On 1/2/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/2/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wel my idea why i want to move it into a subproject was that maybe some
> developer whould find it very usefull to just use a framework for
> getting a bayesian filter integrate with thei
I tend to agree with Serge,
We really need to ensure that the overhead of a separate release cycle
is worth living with for the benefits it will bring.
I agree that there is the potential for some work to be done on this
mailet but I'm -0 to a separate sub-project.
However, it might be a good can
