Good point so maybe upgrading to 2.3 is the way to go for now.. if 2.3
is not ready when we are ready we can just "remove" the shipped
jackrabbit.
Bye,
Norman
2011/2/16 agks mehx :
> yes, if we are ready for 3.0 GA but jackrabbit 2.3 is not, we can all
> moonlight on jackrabbit code and get it t
yes, if we are ready for 3.0 GA but jackrabbit 2.3 is not, we can all
moonlight on jackrabbit code and get it to GA ;-)
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Eric Charles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jackrabbit 2.2.0 has just been released in December 2010.
> It may still take time for 2.3.0.
>
> In the meantim
Hi,
Jackrabbit 2.2.0 has just been released in December 2010.
It may still take time for 2.3.0.
In the meantime, we can release james milestones with jackrabbit snapshots.
JCR-2415 is fixed, and jackrabbit pom parent states lucene 3.0.3.
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/jackrab
switch to jackrabbit 2.3?? but of course i don't know what are the
implications, so this is just a suggestion if it is only a little bit of
work
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Forgot to say that jackrabbit 2.3 will using lucene 3.x.
>
> See https://issues.apache.org/jir
Forgot to say that jackrabbit 2.3 will using lucene 3.x.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2415
Bye,
Norman
2011/2/15 Norman Maurer :
> Hi there,
>
> I worked on some lucene based solution to provide some high
> performance Message search which is needed for IMAP SEARCH command. So
>
Hi there,
I worked on some lucene based solution to provide some high
performance Message search which is needed for IMAP SEARCH command. So
far the implementation works out very well and will make it easy to
support some more search stuff easy.
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX
