> a lot of effort has been expended on developing IMAP support.
> Rather than waste it, perhaps there is a way of sub-dividing
> the functionality required to put it in place.
See:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org&msgNo=3
Once James 2.2.0 ships, I should be able to co
Serge Knystautas wrote:
> Getting IMAP to production quality is far enough away that it
> will not
> get there by individual contributions, and will require probably one
> champion to get it to a usable state.
That is probably correct, but also a shame as a lot of effort has been
expended on devel
Mark Livingstone wrote:
I've tried roadmap documents and old messages from the past few months
but they don't say much about it's future plans. I know everyone is
working hard to get the present RC out in its final form but are there
any plans mooted for working on IMAP in the near future? (say
Serge Knystautas wrote:
Mark Livingstone wrote:
Could you tell me just how useful is the IMAP support at present. I
just need something I can get mail from my ISP's POP server and access
locally via IMAP. At present I do not have domain although that might
come if I get broadband at a later st
Mark Livingstone wrote:
Could you tell me just how useful is the IMAP support at present. I just
need something I can get mail from my ISP's POP server and access
locally via IMAP. At present I do not have domain although that might
come if I get broadband at a later stage.
AFAIK, IMAP only has
Hi Guys,
I have been lurking for a while. I am a documentation / beta tester
person for Mahogany and columba mail clients on Sourceforge and I need
a local IMAP server. If someone is working on it, I would be willing
to help beta test it.
Since at Uni next semester I am going to begin Java pro
