Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
(as everyone probably knows by know i'm a huge unfan of javamail so
i've avoided commenting)
I thought there was no need to be a fan or unfan to reply to this
developer. He simply asked how we are using javamail and how coupled is
James to javamail, and I sim
(as everyone probably knows by know i'm a huge unfan of javamail so
i've avoided commenting)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MimeMessages are built in a lazy way when there is a need to parse or alter
> the message.
>
> As long as you receive and spoo
MimeMessages are built in a lazy way when there is a need to parse or
alter the message.
As long as you receive and spool a message without altering its content
then MimeMessage will never be parsed.
We extensively use our MimeMessageWrapper that is an extension of
MimeMessage made to delay
Hi guys,
I've been watching James for some time now and have been very impressed. I
have a project which I think is perfect for James. But I have some questions
in regards to when and where JavaMail is used.
Our past experience with JavaMail has been disappointing. We still use it but
mostl
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-ja
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javam
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature
complete as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3 compliant)
So what I th
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why would we need both?
We don't need both at the same time.
But:
1) I guess that geronimo-javamail is not as stable and feature complete
as the sun-javamail.
2) We use javamail 1.4 apis (geronimo-javamail seems to be 1.3 compliant)
So what I think we could do is addin
Why would we need both?
Regards,
Alan
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
We currently have hardcoded "instanceof" to Sun classes and we use
many of the "properties" specific to SUN smtp transport.
Btw I see that the new geronimo javamail code is much more complete
and supports many of the properties we
We currently have hardcoded "instanceof" to Sun classes and we use many
of the "properties" specific to SUN smtp transport.
Btw I see that the new geronimo javamail code is much more complete and
supports many of the properties we use.
What should we do?
I would like to at least start includi
12 matches
Mail list logo
