Hi,
I you replace the mailbox 0.2 with 0.3, you still have to update the
spring files.
I read imap was compliant with 0.2 and 0.3, but I remember I had some
issues (some method signature change).
This is why to avoid any compatibility issue, I usually take a trunk or
a release src, and reb
Just ping us if you need some help..
Bye,
Norman
2011/7/12 Saibabu Vallurupalli :
> Okay I will upgrade now :-(
> My colleague scared me saying upgrade is not very easy after replacing
> mailbox 0.3 libraries looks like I have to do some configuration changes. I
> will check with Vanessa.
>
> Th
Okay I will upgrade now :-(
My colleague scared me saying upgrade is not very easy after replacing
mailbox 0.3 libraries looks like I have to do some configuration changes. I
will check with Vanessa.
Thank you,
Sai
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> JPAMailboxMembership wa
JPAMailboxMembership was removed in 0.3 release. Thats why I said it
would be better to move to 0.3 api.
Bye,
Norman
2011/7/12 Saibabu Vallurupalli :
> I took a closure look into the issue I am getting after fixing the
> Excryption logic. I have found a new class in the deployed version of James
I took a closure look into the issue I am getting after fixing the
Excryption logic. I have found a new class in the deployed version of James
i.e., JPAMailBoxMessageMember.java file and this is making call to
JPAMessage.java class with the construct using different parameters.
The exception says
