Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-19 Thread Benoit TELLIER
stack > to > >>> the Postgresql stack. > >>> The scaling-pulsar-smtp assembly uses a SQL database to store > >>> - domains > >>> - users > >>> - recipient rewrite tables > >>> - mail repository url store > >>>

Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-19 Thread Jean Helou
e, > >>> > >>> I am looking into switching the scaling-pulsar-smtp from the JPA stack > to > >>> the Postgresql stack. > >>> The scaling-pulsar-smtp assembly uses a SQL database to store > >>> - domains > >>> - users > &

Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-18 Thread Benoit TELLIER
es >>> - mail repository url store >>> >>> I naively used the JPA implementation to connect to a postgresql db so I >>> thought migrating would be easy enough : swith the implementation and >>> restart the server >>> Unfortunately it doesn'

Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-18 Thread Tran Tung
ma with a `james_` prefix - domains => `james_domain` - mail repository url store => `james_mail_repos` - users => `james_user` - recipient rewrite tables => `james_recipient_rewrite` whereas the postgresql implementation expects different table names: - domains => `domains` - mail repo

Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-17 Thread Jean Helou
> > Unfortunately it doesn't seem as easy as that : > > the JPA implementation generated tables in the configured schema with a > > `james_` prefix > > - domains => `james_domain` > > - mail repository url store => `james_mail_repos` > > - users => `

Re: Postgresql implementation

2025-03-13 Thread Tran Tung
rewrite tables => `james_recipient_rewrite` whereas the postgresql implementation expects different table names: - domains => `domains` - mail repository url store => `mail_repository_url` - users => `users` - recipient rewrite tables => `rrt` The name of the columns within each

Postgresql implementation

2025-03-13 Thread Jean Helou
tory url store => `james_mail_repos` - users => `james_user` - recipient rewrite tables => `james_recipient_rewrite` whereas the postgresql implementation expects different table names: - domains => `domains` - mail repository url store => `mail_repository_url` - users => `users`

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-02-11 Thread Rene Cordier
Hello guys, The work regarding Postgresql implementation has been finally merged on the main branch. Thanks to everybody that reviewed and gave feedback on the PR, ML and Gitter to help finalize this work, it's very appreciated! Best regards, Rene. On 2/3/25 2:18 PM, Rene Cordier

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-02-02 Thread Benoit TELLIER
/02/2025 08:18, Rene Cordier wrote: Hello guys, I'm happy to announce that the vote for Postgresql implementation adoption has succeeded with 5 positive votes and other positive reviews on the related PR as well. The Postgresql implementation will officially be merged to the Apache James

[VOTE] [RESULT] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-02-02 Thread Rene Cordier
Hello guys, I'm happy to announce that the vote for Postgresql implementation adoption has succeeded with 5 positive votes and other positive reviews on the related PR as well. The Postgresql implementation will officially be merged to the Apache James main branch and will beco

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-09 Thread Quan tran hong
> Tung Tran > > > > On 1/7/25 3:48 PM, Rene Cordier wrote: > >> Hello everybody, > >> > >> After a bit more than a year of work on a Postgresql implementation > >> for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our work > >>

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-08 Thread Jan-Eric Hellenberg
maintained as they have become outdated. Hopefully, Postgresql app will be strong alternative. Tung Tran On 1/7/25 3:48 PM, Rene Cordier wrote: Hello everybody, After a bit more than a year of work on a Postgresql implementation for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-07 Thread Tran Tung
a year of work on a Postgresql implementation for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our work to the master branch of the project and add official support for it with Apache James. The final work rebased on latest code can be seen here: https://github.com/apache/james

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-07 Thread Rene Cordier
+1, Rene. On 1/7/25 3:48 PM, Rene Cordier wrote: Hello everybody, After a bit more than a year of work on a Postgresql implementation for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our work to the master branch of the project and add official support for it with Apache James

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-07 Thread Benoit TELLIER
than a year of work on a Postgresql implementation for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our work to the master branch of the project and add official support for it with Apache James. The final work rebased on latest code can be seen here: github.com/apache/james-project/pull

[VOTE] Call for vote: Postgresql implementation adoption for Apache james

2025-01-07 Thread Rene Cordier
Hello everybody, After a bit more than a year of work on a Postgresql implementation for Apache James, we would like to finally propose to merge our work to the master branch of the project and add official support for it with Apache James. The final work rebased on latest code can be seen