RE: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-21 Thread Danny Angus
> Personally I'd rather put my foot in a bacon slicer than use SourceSafe I've never used it, but it must be bad if its more of a PITA than PVCS :-) d. *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and for use by th

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Serge Knystautas
Jason Webb wrote: I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems. You mean MAIN. :) Thank you for that clarification :) I mean that! I currently use (for configuration management, at different customer sites) ClearCas

RE: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Jason Webb
> -Original Message- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 July 2004 17:41 > To: James Developers List > Subject: Re: Committing to HEAD > > Jason Webb wrote: > > I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no l

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Serge Knystautas
Stephen McConnell wrote: So - just to confirm - it would be reasonable to say that I'm working on the HEAD of the MAIN branch? Yes. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >>> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Serge Knystautas wrote: Jason Webb wrote: I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems. You mean MAIN. :) HEAD means the very end of a branch, compared to a datestamp or tag checkout. So - just to confirm - it wou

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason Webb wrote: I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems. Are there newer Cornerstone libraries available, or do code changes need to be made? If they do I'm quite happy to make them, I just need to know I'm s

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Serge Knystautas
Jason Webb wrote: I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems. You mean MAIN. :) HEAD means the very end of a branch, compared to a datestamp or tag checkout. Are there newer Cornerstone libraries available, or d

RE: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-13 Thread Jason Webb
I've checked out HEAD (I think :)) to check something and it no longer builds as it complains about various cornerstone problems. Are there newer Cornerstone libraries available, or do code changes need to be made? If they do I'm quite happy to make them, I just need to know -- Jason --

RE: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Just commit to HEAD (by the way, MAIN and HEAD are two different things). If the code is compatible, commit to both branches. Otherwise, I'll try to figure it out. Steve, if you want a 2.2.1 bugfix, we'll run that out of branch_2_1_fcs. I would not trust an immediate release from the merged cod

RE: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-12 Thread Steve Brewin
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote: > > > Jason Webb wrote: > > I have completed the work on User attributes. > > However I am holding off committing any of the changes > until Noel completes > > the code merge. Is this a good idea? > > > > I would very much like to commit the attribute work before

Re: Committing to HEAD

2004-07-12 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Jason Webb wrote: I have completed the work on User attributes. However I am holding off committing any of the changes until Noel completes the code merge. Is this a good idea? I would very much like to commit the attribute work before I start the IMAP work in anger. -- Jason --