Re: IMAP implementation questions

2003-11-10 Thread Zoe
Hi Danny, On Nov 10, 2003, Danny Angus wrote: Zoe, (Beware, long answer!) Thanks for the explanations :) Ist point.. James IMAP component is very much alpha status *still* . Oh, well... that would make only three incomplete IMAP implementations I know of: James, JimapD and Foedus. Do I see a tr

RE: IMAP implementation questions

2003-11-10 Thread Jason Webb
Hi Zoe (if that's your name and not your project's :) If it is, apologies) The IMAP part of James is not in step with the current James code for one important reason: You cannot persist messages in an IMAP store. This is because the current implmentation of IMAP takes messages (from SMTP) and store