Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> i could reduce the quantity of warnings etc
> but perhaps they are useful reminders.
Perhaps.
> what i could do is add a 'quiet' property which would allow people to
> decide whether they need to see all that noise or not. opinions?
If that just means that the nigh
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 9/9/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 8/19/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any idea how we can eliminate some of this extraneous garbage so
that the build report can be posted? Or should I just shut down the
>>
On 9/9/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/19/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Any idea how we can eliminate some of this extraneous garbage so
> > > that the build report can be posted? Or should I just shut down the
> > > nightly
> > > builds because
On 8/19/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
> > Something has been changed in the past couple of weeks, and the nightly
> > build e-mails are broken again. Since the last one, containing 94K, was
> > sent on August 10th, we have not only gone over 100K of output
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> What about a "| grep -v javadoc" while you write the mail body?
>> Sure, I'll give it a shot and we'll see.
>
> Please review the latest nightly build report. We're just under 64K.
> Satisfied with the content? An
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > What about a "| grep -v javadoc" while you write the mail body?
> Sure, I'll give it a shot and we'll see.
Please review the latest nightly build report. We're just under 64K.
Satisfied with the content? Anything else we want to strip out?
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> What about a "| grep -v javadoc" while you write the mail body?
Sure, I'll give it a shot and we'll see.
> I would like to have nightly for everyone of our projects: some day ago
> I had to do a nightly build for jspf to let an user test a bugfix.
> Where do you run thi
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
> We block those attachments, IIRC. :-) Besides, the full script is:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> #
> (
>echo "To: JAMES Server Development "
>echo "From: JAMES Nightly Build System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>echo "Subject: JAMES Server Nightly Build Report"
>
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
> Something has been changed in the past couple of weeks, and the nightly
> build e-mails are broken again. Since the last one, containing 94K, was
> sent on August 10th, we have not only gone over 100K of output, we're at
> 239K of output!
>
> As a point of reference,
> If you make a tail -20 of log (and full log... pkzip & attach as file?)
:-)
We block those attachments, IIRC. :-) Besides, the full script is:
#!/bin/sh
#
#
(
echo "To: JAMES Server Development "
echo "From: JAMES Nightly Build System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
echo "Subject: JAMES
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
Something has been changed in the past couple of weeks, and the nightly
build e-mails are broken again. Since the last one, containing 94K, was
sent on August 10th, we have not only gone over 100K of output, we're at
239K of output!
As a point of reference, back in Dece
Hi Noel,
If you make a tail -20 of log (and full log... pkzip & attach as file?) :-)
Saludos,
Guillermo
- Original Message -
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2007 12:00 AM
Subject: Nightly Build Reports Too Big (again)
12 matches
Mail list logo
