IMHO you are describing a release numbering scheme that has never be
used in past for James. I don't think we should ever discuss about this now.
As an example you deprecated fetchpop in 2.1 and added fetchmail in 2.2.
You changed a FULL component in a minor point release without even using
a d
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> IMHO you are describing a release numbering scheme that has never
> be used in past for James.
We've oft-debated what the next version number should be, and I think that we
might agree that at least some of our v2 versions should probably have become
v3, but we had envi
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
What I described is, from memory, something that we have discussed when we've
tried to address versioning. Are you saying that you don't agree with the
idea, or what?
The only thing important to me is that we don't care about numbers while
we develop.
We put in the
