Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-22 Thread Eric Charles
I finally opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3869 Now announced on: Blog:https://blogs.apache.org/james/entry/apache_james_server_3_0 Tweet: https://twitter.com/#!/ApacheJames/status/105554576597458944 Enjoy :) On 22/08/11 08:40, Eric Charles wrote: From Belgium, depending on

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Eric Charles
From Belgium, depending on the mirror, the replication is ok or not (apache.cu.be fine, megamobile.be...) A Smurf is taking fun of me... What can we do to fix this? Eric On 21/08/11 14:40, Eric Charles wrote: Sanity check: Project web site is now live, but http://apache.megamobile.be/james/

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > Hi Robert, > > OK, index.html was the cause. > > I have just deployed project and server (with javadoc) websites (soon > rsynched). Thanks > Now time for the announce :) with > - james user mailing list > - apache announce mailing list > -

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > I forgot to update server index page. Now, it's done. All looks good :-) > I will create on jenkins (when infra will have given me the rights) a build > for the app, and will update http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ > to point t

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Eric Charles
I forgot to update server index page. Now, it's done. I will create on jenkins (when infra will have given me the rights) a build for the app, and will update http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/ to point to beta3 and no more to the old M3. Thx. On 21/08/11 14:40, Eric Charles wro

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Eric Charles
Sanity check: Project web site is now live, but http://apache.megamobile.be/james/apache-james/3.0-beta3/apache-james-3.0-beta3-app.zip mirror has not be replicated. Eric On 21/08/11 11:21, Eric Charles wrote: Hi Robert, OK, index.html was the cause. I have just deployed project and serve

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-21 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Robert, OK, index.html was the cause. I have just deployed project and server (with javadoc) websites (soon rsynched). Now time for the announce :) with - james user mailing list - apache announce mailing list - http://blogs.apache.org/james/ - http://twitter.com/#!/ApacheJames The messag

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Eric Charles wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> Mirrors are updated, e.g. http://apache.cu.be/james/apache-james/3.0-beta3/ >> >> If you look at the links, they all point to http://repository.apache.org/... >

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Mirrors are updated, e.g. http://apache.cu.be/james/apache-james/3.0-beta3/ > > If you look at the links, they all point to http://repository.apache.org/... >  which is not the goal. It should point to a http://apache.cu.be/

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-20 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Robert, Mirrors are updated, e.g. http://apache.cu.be/james/apache-james/3.0-beta3/ If you look at the links, they all point to http://repository.apache.org/... which is not the goal. It should point to a http://apache.cu.be/. I put download page update and site deploy on-hold so you

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > On 18/08/11 19:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> We (finally) have an official 3.0-beta3 release :-) >> > > :) > >> 1. Do we want to distribute it from www,apache.org [1]? >> > > I think so. > Mirrors will be updated this way. Uploaded y

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-19 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
2011/8/19 Robert Burrell Donkin : > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Eric Charles wrote: >> On 18/08/11 22:41, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: > > > >>> p.s. more integration tests pass as of today. I don't know how many >>> left, but the implementation should pass all tests on Monday, the >>> final day.

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-19 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > On 18/08/11 22:41, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: >> p.s. more integration tests pass as of today. I don't know how many >> left, but the implementation should pass all tests on Monday, the >> final day. >> I hope to have some better documentation

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-19 Thread Eric Charles
On 18/08/11 22:41, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote: Hi Eric, This will be a good time to integrate the NetBeans patch for building James. Do you think you can integrate it? It has been committed in doc so will be available when web site will be deployed. p.s. more integration tests pass as of today

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-18 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
2011/8/18 Eric Charles : > On 18/08/11 19:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> We (finally) have an official 3.0-beta3 release :-) >> > > :) Congrats! >> 1. Do we want to distribute it from www,apache.org [1]? >> > > I think so. > Mirrors will be updated this way. > >> 2. We need to update the

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-18 Thread Norman Maurer
2011/8/18 Robert Burrell Donkin : > We (finally) have an official 3.0-beta3 release :-) > > 1. Do we want to distribute it from www,apache.org [1]? > Yeah sure.. beta releases belong there.. Bye, Norman - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Apache James 3.0-beta3

2011-08-18 Thread Eric Charles
On 18/08/11 19:18, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: We (finally) have an official 3.0-beta3 release :-) :) 1. Do we want to distribute it from www,apache.org [1]? I think so. Mirrors will be updated this way. 2. We need to update the website. Any volunteers? I will mvn site-deploy when m

Re: Apache James 3.0 beta3

2011-07-27 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > I'm away tomorrow (18th) for a  week with limited computer time (my > sister-in-law is expecting #4 in the next few weeks :-) > > I think all that remains before we're able to ship an official > 3.0-beta3 application is generating cor