Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
(as everyone probably knows by know i'm a huge unfan of javamail so
i've avoided commenting)
I thought there was no need to be a fan or unfan to reply to this
developer. He simply asked how we are using javamail and how coupled is
James to javamail, and I sim
(as everyone probably knows by know i'm a huge unfan of javamail so
i've avoided commenting)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MimeMessages are built in a lazy way when there is a need to parse or alter
> the message.
>
> As long as you receive and spoo
MimeMessages are built in a lazy way when there is a need to parse or
alter the message.
As long as you receive and spool a message without altering its content
then MimeMessage will never be parsed.
We extensively use our MimeMessageWrapper that is an extension of
MimeMessage made to delay
