On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
>>> if we follow stefano's design reasonin
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
>>
>> if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs
>> t
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
>
> if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs
> to be moved from LocalDelivery into a separate mailet
I'm not f
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
>
> if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs
> to be moved from LocalDelivery into a separate mailet
A little
I created an jira issue and attached some patch.. please review:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-882
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Norman Maurer :
> I only moved it the UserRepositoryAliasForwarding mailet because of
> some "shared" code. I think it would prolly be better to extract
> sh
I only moved it the UserRepositoryAliasForwarding mailet because of
some "shared" code. I think it would prolly be better to extract
shared code to an Abstract class and seperate the "vut store" and
userrepository stuff.
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs
to be moved from LocalDelivery into a separate mailet
- robert
--
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Should I just go ahead an commit it
stefano?
> ( and open a jira issue) ?
i have a (failing) smoke test for VUT so opening a JIRA would be useful anyway
- robert
-
To un
Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ?
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> I thought of something like this:
>
>
>
> definitely looks neater
>
> - robert
>
>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> I thought of something like this:
definitely looks neater
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ser
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>> Ah ok now I see what makes you wonder... thats right. isLocalEmail
>>> works only after the vut mappings was done. Thats prolly a problem in
>>>
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Ah ok now I see what makes you wonder... thats right. isLocalEmail
>> works only after the vut mappings was done. Thats prolly a problem in
>> some cases..
>
> it's the problem in my case :-)
>
> (the co
I thought of something like this:
Index: UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding.java
===
--- UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding.java (revision 726438)
+++ UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding.java (working copy)
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
im
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Ah ok now I see what makes you wonder... thats right. isLocalEmail
>> works only after the vut mappings was done. Thats prolly a problem in
>> some cases..
>
> it's the problem
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ah ok now I see what makes you wonder... thats right. isLocalEmail
> works only after the vut mappings was done. Thats prolly a problem in
> some cases..
it's the problem in my case :-)
(the code's very messy since it's trying to ensure bac
Ah ok now I see what makes you wonder... thats right. isLocalEmail
works only after the vut mappings was done. Thats prolly a problem in
some cases..
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> I think it works li
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I think it works like it should... if virtualhosting is not used it
> just use the username to check if it is enable it use the complete
> emailaddress.
> Why you think it not works as aspected ?
suppose supp...@example.org ma
Hi Robert,
I think it works like it should... if virtualhosting is not used it
just use the username to check if it is enable it use the complete
emailaddress.
Why you think it not works as aspected ?
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Norman Mau
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok I will try to fix it now.. Do you think we should create an extra
> mailet or better include it in localDelivery ?
> I think I would prolly add it to localDelivery
UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding is used by LocalDelivery and appears
to
Ok I will try to fix it now.. Do you think we should create an extra
mailet or better include it in localDelivery ?
I think I would prolly add it to localDelivery
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Sorry Robert I'm a bit
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Sorry Robert I'm a bit confused.. So after adding that config stuff it
> should just be a Matter of coding the right Mailet to support the VUT
> stuff ?
i think that it should just work once the config is right
- robert
--
Sorry Robert I'm a bit confused.. So after adding that config stuff it
should just be a Matter of coding the right Mailet to support the VUT
stuff ?
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> that's what I have d
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> that's what I have done ;-)
i needed to add that to my test
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional comma
Hi Robert,
that's what I have done ;-)
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> thx for digging a bit deeper. I think we just need a Mailet which do
>> the "rewrite" of the recipients and add it before the Loc
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> thx for digging a bit deeper. I think we just need a Mailet which do
> the "rewrite" of the recipients and add it before the LocalDelivery
> mailet.
>
> Anythink I miss ?
the same thing i missed ;-)
the code's there but the
Hi Robert,
thx for digging a bit deeper. I think we just need a Mailet which do
the "rewrite" of the recipients and add it before the LocalDelivery
mailet.
Anythink I miss ?
Cheers,
Norman
2008/12/14 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 a
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi Robert,
comments inside...
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>> Hi Robert,
>>> comments inside...
>>> 2008/12/13 Robert Burrell Donkin :
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:5
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>> comments inside...
>> 2008/12/13 Robert Burrell Donkin :
>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> I think before the defunc it get calle
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> comments inside...
>
>
> 2008/12/13 Robert Burrell Donkin :
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> after some long time I had some time to look at james trunk source
>>> again.
>>
>> cool
Hi Robert,
comments inside...
2008/12/13 Robert Burrell Donkin :
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> after some long time I had some time to look at james trunk source
>> again.
>
> cool :-)
>
>> I tried to deploy a james install and use VirtualUserTable tod
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> after some long time I had some time to look at james trunk source
> again.
cool :-)
> I tried to deploy a james install and use VirtualUserTable todo
> all the forwarding stuff. But It seems it get never caleld todo the
> mapp
34 matches
Mail list logo
