Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-22 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >> >> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: >>> >>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2008,

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-22 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-21 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real dependencies on SUN's javamai

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-21 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The issue is that we use activation/javamail to connect to an smtp url. javamail give us a Transport (an interface defined in the specification). In order to better catch errors and to s

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-21 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>> Having removed the CRLFOutputStream

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-21 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real dependencies on SUN's javamail *implementation* (com.sun c

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having >> real dependencies on SUN's javamail *implementation* (com.sun classes) is >> the RemoteDel

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-20 Thread David Jencks
On Jun 20, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real dependencies on SUN's javamail *implementation* (com.sun classes) is the RemoteDelivery mailet. Geronimo's implementation provides almost identical classes but o

Re: RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-20 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real > dependencies on SUN's javamail *implementation* (com.sun classes) is the > RemoteDelivery mailet. > > Geronimo's implementation provides almost

RemoteDelivery vs sun and geronimo javamail implementation

2008-06-20 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Having removed the CRLFOutputStream depedendency the only class having real dependencies on SUN's javamail *implementation* (com.sun classes) is the RemoteDelivery mailet. Geronimo's implementation provides almost identical classes but of course they are in their own package. IMO it woul be