RE: Result [VOTE] Using 2.3 branch

2007-01-12 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Fine. Enjoy. Have fun. Until the functionality vetoed by Stefano is in place, you can consider my vote on the release to be -1. I think that the behavior towards our users is unconscionable and inexcusable, and I will not support any further releases of JAMES that do not include such changes.

Re: Result [VOTE] Using 2.3 branch

2007-01-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Norman Maurer wrote: So i think i will "move" the current 2.3 branch to next-minor branch and start a new 2.3 branch from 2_3_0 tag. Please take care to not loose (re-apply/merge) my commits r469117 and r475204. They are website/documentation fixes already deployed. Stefano -

Re: Result [VOTE] Using 2.3 branch

2007-01-08 Thread Norman Maurer
Thx Danny :-) I will create/rename the branch etc soon. bye Norman Danny Angus schrieb: > Norman, > I've updated the status file with the numbers of the binding votes, so > that it is clear what was decided. > > On 1/8/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mornin, >> I think its time t

Re: Result [VOTE] Using 2.3 branch

2007-01-08 Thread Danny Angus
Norman, I've updated the status file with the numbers of the binding votes, so that it is clear what was decided. On 1/8/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mornin, I think its time to close the VOTE as i started it at 18.12.06. So here we go.. 1) Commit fixes and new "minor" features

Result [VOTE] Using 2.3 branch

2007-01-07 Thread Norman Maurer
Mornin, I think its time to close the VOTE as i started it at 18.12.06. So here we go.. 1) Commit fixes and new "minor" features to 2.3 branch Binding: [-1] 3 Stefano, Bernd, Norman [-0] 0 [+0] 0 [+1] 1 Vinzeno Non Binding; [-1] 1 Joachim [-0] 0 [+0] 0 [+1] 0 2) Commit only bugfixes to 2.3 bra