Re: Rewrite table specification

Hi, I agree with the Rewrite Table specifications. Best regards, Benoit Le 10/09/2015 09:43, Antoine DUPRAT a écrit : Hi all, Does everyone agree with those specifications? I will send the PR in a few days, no answer will be considered as an approbation. Thx, Antoine Hi Eric, Antoine

Re: Rewrite table specification

Hi all, Does everyone agree with those specifications? I will send the PR in a few days, no answer will be considered as an approbation. Thx, Antoine Hi Eric, Antoine wrote some specifications based on actual implementation behavior in order to implement a Cassandra backend. He should h

Re: Rewrite table specification

Hi Eric, Antoine wrote some specifications based on actual implementation behavior in order to implement a Cassandra backend. He should have give you the plain text specification link https://github.com/aduprat/james/blob/Issue-9/data/data-library/src/test/resources/cucumber/rewrite_tables.fe

Re: Rewrite table specification

What is the impact on the existing rewrite implementations? On 2015-08-05 11:10, Antoine DUPRAT wrote: Hi all, As explained in the issue JAMES-1594 , we would like to write the specification on rewrite table. The existing implementations are not

Rewrite table specification

Hi all, As explained in the issue JAMES-1594 , we would like to write the specification on rewrite table. The existing implementations are not all equivalent, and so we introduce issues related: * JAMES-1595