RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-17 Thread Steve Brewin
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > All Committers should be using using https, not http. > Oh hit, typo. -- Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
All Committers should be using using https, not http. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I checked out the 'trunk' -- is that OK? Trunk == MAIN. The only person who has been playing in there is Stephen, IIRC. That should change RSN, but in the meantime you probably want to checkout branches/branch_2_1_fcs. --- Noel ---

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> * What is the actual development branch? Currently, branches/branch_2_1_fcs. In the future, I expect to see multiple development branches, e.g., a branch where we are working on the changes necessary for IMAP, until they are ready to merge into the trunk. > * I am using Tortoise SVN on Windows

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Steve Brewin
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote: > > > Looks ok for me. > > But I could only browse, not checkout (using tortoise). Is it > expected > to behave like this for now? You should be able to checkout! Does the command line version... svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/james/trunk/ james

Re: Test SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Looks ok for me. But I could only browse, not checkout (using tortoise). Is it expected to behave like this for now? Vincenzo Serge Knystautas wrote: Noel has done a test migration of James CVS code to SVN. It's available at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/james If anyone can give it a test

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Hes Siemelink
... Cheers, Hes. -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 16:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test SVN migration Noel has done a test migration of James CVS code to SVN. It's available at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/tes

Re: SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Soren Hilmer
tely in bug report JAMES-333 (which talks about > CVS) so I guess the migration was OK... > > Cheers, > > Hes. > > -Original Message- > From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 16:40 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sub

RE: SVN migration

2004-11-16 Thread Hes Siemelink
Hes. -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 16:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Test SVN migration Noel has done a test migration of James CVS code to SVN. It's available at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/james If

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-15 Thread Danny Angus
> And being at ApacheCon is about working on ASF related > activities, from my perspective. Thats why I thought your timing was odd, unless you count this as one of course. Which I didn't, duh! Having a nice time? d. *** T

RE: Test SVN migration

2004-11-15 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Danny Angus wrote: > Seems to work for me, I didn't get it, but browsing through I think > I see all the tags and branches I'd expect to see in cvs. And more > or less all the files. And I find it even easier to find previous versions, since we can browse the tags, whereas with CVS, much of the o

Re: Test SVN migration

2004-11-15 Thread Danny Angus
| | cc: | |

Test SVN migration

2004-11-15 Thread Serge Knystautas
Noel has done a test migration of James CVS code to SVN. It's available at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/james If anyone can give it a test and confirm it worked, we'll hopefully cut over soon. -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656