Re: Server modules Naming/Grouping

2012-01-06 Thread Eric Charles
If no negative feedback, I will start implementing the nested structure based on Stefano proposal this weekend. Thx, Eric On 06/01/12 06:32, Eric Charles wrote: Hi Stefano, Yes, I remember the work you did analysing the modules in that jira. I find the grouping in the jira not far away from th

Re: Server modules Naming/Grouping

2012-01-05 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Stefano, Yes, I remember the work you did analysing the modules in that jira. I find the grouping in the jira not far away from the groups I defined. The key points here are: - Do we go to a 2 level structure ? (I would do it) - Even if those groups are not usable as standalone alone component

Re: Server modules Naming/Grouping

2012-01-05 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2012/1/5 Eric Charles : > Hi there, > > Doing recent protocols trunk integration in server, it became clear to me > that our server components can be grouped together to form coherent > subcomponents (even usable outside James mail server, but that's another > story). Please, read my comment to th

Server modules Naming/Grouping

2012-01-05 Thread Eric Charles
Hi there, Doing recent protocols trunk integration in server, it became clear to me that our server components can be grouped together to form coherent subcomponents (even usable outside James mail server, but that's another story). btw, Recent Apache Hadoop mavenization gave birth to 38 mod