TBH Noel I'd rather explore JMX, I've been looking at JBOSS 4 and its JMX
architecture seems to describe what I'd like to see James have.
I'm certainly not convinced that JMS is really the best approach. It would
be sadly ironic if we end up with James performance suffering because of
JMS queue
What is being used for JMS, and how available is this for other ASF
projects? We have a possible use for JMS in a future revision of James, and
it would be helpful to have JMS support generically available in Avalon.
For our purposes, a JMS implementation should be fast and lightweight,
support i
What is being used for JMS, and how available is this for other ASF
projects? We have a possible use for JMS in a future revision of James, and
it would be helpful to have JMS support generically available in Avalon.
For our purposes, a JMS implementation should be fast and lightweight,
support i
Noel,
> That is my position, as well. Considering that I used to write real-time
> embedded kernels for a living (albiet a couple of decades ago),
performance
> is never far from my mind. Personally, I think that JMS is overkill, but
it
> has been recommended that we look at it, so I'm aski
> > Personally, I think that JMS is overkill, but it has
> > been recommended that we look at it, so I'm asking the
> > geronimo team what the status is so that we can evaluate.
> > I've other alternatives in mind, as well.
> Fair points, and I'd stress that I'm not against JMS per se, but to
exp
First time poster (so bare with me). If or when we move this thing from
phoenix to merlin doesn't merlin have jmx integration already?
On Nov 4, 2003, at 7:06 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Personally, I think that JMS is overkill, but it has
been recommended that we look at it, so I'm asking the
ge
> From: Danny Angus wrote:
> Anyway lets carry on turning over rocks and see what crawls out
Once we start distributing function across JVMs we have to be real smart to
avoid a performance impact regardless of the protocol used. We also have to
take care that the changes do not adversely impact
> I'd rather explore JMX, I've been looking at JBOSS 4 and its JMX
> architecture seems to describe what I'd like to see James have.
JMX and JMS don't serve the same purposes. JMS *might* (and I stress that
it is only a possibility, and not one that I'm overly convinced about)
provide a spool imp
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:41, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> What is being used for JMS, and how available is this for other ASF
> projects? We have a possible use for JMS in a future revision of James, and
> it would be helpful to have JMS support generically available in Avalon.
see PhoenixJMS: http:
On 4 Nov 2003, at 16:22, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'd rather explore JMX, I've been looking at JBOSS 4 and its JMX
architecture seems to describe what I'd like to see James have.
JMX and JMS don't serve the same purposes. JMS *might* (and I stress
that
it is only a possibility, and not one that I'm
> From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 8:45 AM
>
> I'd use OpenJMS or JGroups for now. There is no JMS implementation
> inside Geronimo yet & I can't imagine there would be one for a while.
>
The intention is to integrate an existing JMS implementation
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
> > I'd use OpenJMS or JGroups for now. There is no JMS implementation
> > inside Geronimo yet & I can't imagine there would be one for a while.
> The intention is to integrate an existing JMS implementation using JCA now
> that we have transaction and
: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:07 PM
> To: James Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Status of JMS
>
>
> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> > James Strachan wrote:
> > > I'd
Hi,
I would like to have more information about the JMS Mailet, is it
already available?
Is there any repository of mailets?
Thanks in advance!
Johann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
There isn't a JMS Mailet of which I am aware.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: johann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 5:32
To: James Developers List
Subject: Status of JMS Mailet?
Hi,
I would like to have more information about the JMS Mailet,
johan wrote:
> I would like to have more information about the JMS Mailet, is it
> already available?
I believe someone at BEA wrote a James Mailet as part of a demonstration of
JMS. You might be able to find it on their developer site -
http://dev2dev.bea.com/index.jsp. To be honest, it ought to
16 matches
Mail list logo
