Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
>> what for problems you noticed ? Can you give an example so we can maybe
>> write a junit test for this first ?
>>
>
> You can see Stefano's response for an observation about how our current
> pull-model approach works well. But as we change to a push model
> proces
> what for problems you noticed ? Can you give an example so we can maybe
> write a junit test for this first ?
You can see Stefano's response for an observation about how our current
pull-model approach works well. But as we change to a push model
processing, the loop operation needs to be based
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Bernd (or anyone else feeling like working on this),
As I'm working on the revised I/O handling, I've been paying attention to
issues related to pipelining. Would you please make sure that we have some
tests to validate proper behavior for RFC 2920?
Also, we currently sh
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "James-Dev Mailing List"
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 2:56 AM
Subject: Testing SMTP pipelining
Bernd (or anyone else feeling like working on this),
As I'm working on the revised I/O handling, I've been paying attention to
issues related t
Hi Noel,
what for problems you noticed ? Can you give an example so we can maybe
write a junit test for this first ?
bye
Norman
Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
> Bernd (or anyone else feeling like working on this),
>
> As I'm working on the revised I/O handling, I've been paying attention to
> issues
Bernd (or anyone else feeling like working on this),
As I'm working on the revised I/O handling, I've been paying attention to
issues related to pipelining. Would you please make sure that we have some
tests to validate proper behavior for RFC 2920?
Also, we currently show RFC 2197 as the RFC fo
