Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-03-19 Thread Benoit TELLIER
Hello, To conclude this long running discussion, with 5 positive feedback expressed and no downvotes, we are going to merge https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/1963 which upgrades Apache James to Java 21. Thanks to all people involved on making this move a success. Best regards,

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-14 Thread Eugen Stan
La 14.02.2024 10:00, Jean Helou a scris: Hello Eugen, Libraries IMO should be released with support for older versions versions. Not every project can use the latest and greatest JVM. And I don't think low level libraries (mime4j) will benefit a lot from new Java language features. Just to

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-14 Thread Benoit TELLIER
Hello, Libraries are not concerned by the Java 21 adoption, at least in the prosal made by Quan and I. On 14/02/2024 09:00, Jean Helou wrote: Hello Eugen, Libraries IMO should be released with support for older versions versions. Not every project can use the latest and greatest

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-14 Thread Jean Helou
Hello Eugen, Libraries IMO should be released with support for older versions versions. > Not every project can use the latest and greatest JVM. > And I don't think low level libraries (mime4j) will benefit a lot from > new Java language features. Just to clarify : what do you mean by libraries

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-12 Thread Benoit TELLIER
Hi everyone, I would like to formalize a bit better this vote (thanks Quan for proposing it.)  - Voting starts from 06/02/2024 (in order to take into account initial feedback on Quan mail)  - And ends on 16/02/2024 (4 days) This is a lazy consensus. This vote may be vetoed (vetos shall be

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-07 Thread Eugen Stan
Hi Quan, +1 for Java 21 for new James distribution version. Libraries IMO should be released with support for older versions versions. Not every project can use the latest and greatest JVM. And I don't think low level libraries (mime4j) will benefit a lot from new Java language features.

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-06 Thread Benoit TELLIER
Hi Quan +1 on the principle. However I have a few remarks: 1. Please be precise on James versions:  - Java 21 will be used by Apache James for versions 3.9.0 onward  - Java 11 will be used by Apache James for versions 3.7.x and 3.8.x. No backport of the Java 21 switch is planned. 2. Votes

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-05 Thread Tung Tran
+1 I like java 21 On 06/02/2024 10:36, Quan tran hong wrote: Hi everyone, Following the Jira ticket and the previous mailing list discussion

Re: Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-05 Thread Rene Cordier
+1, Thanks for the efforts on this work :) Rene. On 2/6/24 10:36, Quan tran hong wrote: Hi everyone, Following the Jira ticket and the previous mailing list discussion

Vote to merge the Java 21 adoption for Apache James PR

2024-02-05 Thread Quan tran hong
Hi everyone, Following the Jira ticket and the previous mailing list discussion regarding Java 21 adoption for James, I and Benoit put