Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-09 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi Danny, just do it when you have a timeslot. I don't want to stress you ;-) bye Norman Danny Angus schrieb: > I'll do it, when is the last date? > > On 2/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Norman Maurer ha scritto: >> >> put the same content: >> >> * in the README >> >> * in t

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-08 Thread Danny Angus
I'll do it, when is the last date? On 2/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Norman Maurer ha scritto: >> put the same content: >> * in the README >> * in the config.xml >> * in the RELEASE_NOTES >> * in the download advertising >> * in the announcement >> >> - robert > > It whould b

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-08 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Norman Maurer ha scritto: put the same content: * in the README * in the config.xml * in the RELEASE_NOTES * in the download advertising * in the announcement - robert It whould be nice if someone with better english "knowledge" could propose the text. FYI I filed a JIRA issue and assigned

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-08 Thread Norman Maurer
robert burrell donkin schrieb: > On 2/4/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Norman Maurer wrote: >> > Danny Angus schrieb: > > > >> > Maybe we should also include a "NOTICE" file in the builds which >> > explains this issue ? >> >> NOTICE is already used for legal issues. >> Maybe th

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-08 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 2/4/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Norman Maurer wrote: > Danny Angus schrieb: > Maybe we should also include a "NOTICE" file in the builds which > explains this issue ? NOTICE is already used for legal issues. Maybe the README is better, but I would prefer to use config.

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-04 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Norman Maurer wrote: Danny Angus schrieb: On 2/3/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Where should we add documentation? Good question, some where in here:http://james.apache.org/server/2.3.0/index.html and possibly as an FAQ. I'll do this, perhaps you could raise a jira issue an

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-04 Thread Norman Maurer
Danny Angus schrieb: > On 2/3/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Where should we add documentation? > > Good question, some where in > here:http://james.apache.org/server/2.3.0/index.html and possibly as > an FAQ. > > > I'll do this, perhaps you could raise a jira issue and assign

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-04 Thread Danny Angus
On 2/3/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Where should we add documentation? Good question, some where in here:http://james.apache.org/server/2.3.0/index.html and possibly as an FAQ. I'll do this, perhaps you could raise a jira issue and assign it to me so I don't forget. d. -

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-04 Thread Danny Angus
On 2/3/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Where should we add documentation? Good question, some where in here:http://james.apache.org/server/2.3.0/index.html and possibly as an FAQ. I'll do this, perhaps you could raise a jira issue and assign it to me so I don't forget. d. -

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-03 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Danny Angus wrote: As the new default for our run scripts I used 300 seconds. If you prefer "0" or another period feel free to suggest a new one. sounds reasonable if it is *clearly* documented so that people who experience issues can RTM to resolve them. Where should we add documentation?

Re: v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-03 Thread Danny Angus
On 2/2/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While working on the fix I decided to publish the Security.setProperty configuration as a system property so that the default behaviour of the phoenix laucher jar is not changed sounds sensible. but we can tune the default value via a sys

v2.3 backport for unbounded cache fix (Was: svn commit: r502713)

2007-02-02 Thread Stefano Bagnara
As we decided in "[VOTE RESULT] InetAddress unbounded cache patch backport" I will backport this fix on the v2.3 in 3 days. While working on the fix I decided to publish the Security.setProperty configuration as a system property so that the default behaviour of the phoenix laucher jar is not