On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:11:23 tri...@samba.org wrote:
> The per-block rolling hash should also be randomly seeded as Martin
> mentioned. That way if the user does ask for the page again then the
> hashing will be different. You need to send that seed along with the
> request.
Hi Tridge,
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 15:52:22 Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Well, 'strong' here is relative. In order to keep the checksum length
> > finite and hence encode more blocks we only use a portion of the bits; it's
> > a tradeoff. And so an
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Well, 'strong' here is relative. In order to keep the checksum length finite
> and hence encode more blocks we only use a portion of the bits; it's a
> tradeoff. And so an overall checksum is important, just to verify that the
> final re
Hi Toby,
> The plan was to include something like an sha1 hash of the original file in
> the response headers. Then once the file has been decoded you can check to
> make sure it matches. If not you can resend the request without the black
> hash header and get the file the oldfashioned way.
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 23:29:23 Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Toby Collett wrote:
> > There is no error checking in the encoding itself, this is assumed to be
> > taken care in other layers, and we through in a strong hash on the whole
> > file to make sure this is co
The plan was to include something like an sha1 hash of the original file in
the response headers. Then once the file has been decoded you can check to
make sure it matches. If not you can resend the request without the black
hash header and get the file the oldfashioned way.
Toby
2009/4/1 Martin
We are only using 30 bit hashes, so even if it was a perfect hash it is
possible you could get a collision. Having said that our collision space is
only the single web request, so should reduce chances of error.
Toby
2009/4/1 Martin Langhoff
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Toby Collett wrot
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Toby Collett wrote:
> We are only using 30 bit hashes, so even if it was a perfect hash it is
> possible you could get a collision. Having said that our collision space is
> only the single web request, so should reduce chances of error.
IIRC, if rsync thinks ther
Ok I have the gadget RPM installed. What should I see in the admin
interface? I looked at virtual hosts -> nodes -> modules and I don't see
anything likely.
How can I tell if gadget is doing anything interesting?
Thanks
Dave
--
Dave Bauer
d...@solutiongrove.com
http://solutiongrove.com
__
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Dave Bauer :
> > Next I tried the gadget package
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1261886 RPM but it
> > required ejabberd package. RPM says this is not installed. (I did install
> > python-twisted which was
2009/3/31 Dave Bauer :
> Next I tried the gadget package
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1261886 RPM but it
> required ejabberd package. RPM says this is not installed. (I did install
> python-twisted which was another requirement of the RPM).
What version of the XS have you g
Hi,
I am trying to get gadget working on my XS at schoolserver.solutiongrove.com
First I downloaded the source and built it, but I could not find any
indication that gadget was installed. How can I tell if it is working?
Next I tried the gadget package
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> - User aliasing for ds-backup and login is what I am working on
> today. It applies to the use case scenario of "my laptop has been
> replaced, and I want the XS to know my old identity".
Fleshed out here
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XS_Blue
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Toby Collett wrote:
> There is no error checking in the encoding itself, this is assumed to be
> taken care in other layers, and we through in a strong hash on the whole
> file to make sure this is correct.
Is that right? I thought what Rusty was saying re crcsync
One thing we need to do is think about the headers carefully, as this is the
aspect of the project we could promote as a web standard. There is a large
amount of flexibility we could put in to this, but as Rusty has said, if
there is a way someone can implement a protocol wrong they will. So we nee
15 matches
Mail list logo
