2009/10/30 Martin Langhoff :
> It is about avoiding maintaining a bespoke lib. If you say it is a
> variant on a python standard lib, do you think we can subclass it? Or
> is there a reason not to?
Yeah it can probably be subclassed.
>> It is needed up until Python 3.0, unless you know of a pytho
Martin,
After turning on verbose debugging in the logs and tailing them during
an attempted restore.
I noticed a series of errors that ended with
AttributeError: "JournalEntryBundle" object has no attribute
'get_bundle_id'
I don't believe it's browse as it seems to be doing the right thing. I
t
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I don't understand this question. My patch only adds it for
> xs-activation purposes.
It is about avoiding maintaining a bespoke lib. If you say it is a
variant on a python standard lib, do you think we can subclass it? Or
is there a reason n
2009/10/27 Martin Langhoff :
> Right... makes sense. I am a bit intrigued with the custom config file
> parser / writer (that is 3x the sloc of the whole xs-activation ;-) ).
It's not really a custom config file parser. It's a trivial change to
Python's own ConfigParser class. The only change is i
