On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:12 PM, rihowa...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> In closing I would like to say, I do not think most administrators would
> care about RHEL6 or CentOS. In fact they may prefer the modern up to date
> Fedora 14 features.
>
> Thanks
>
> rihowa...@gmail.com
>
>
Seconded. Sticking to
Martin,
I was about to email you regarding what is the latest XS version as I am about
to get back to attempting to port
the XS to ARM so your email is timely to me.
I had put that on hold for quite a while as it turned out Fedora ARM 11/12
lacked a number of items required by the XS.
The Fedora
> Even if a location doesn't have internet access, daily reporting of the
number of unique XOs that got IP addresses would probably be informative.
At
> least you'd have a quick way to see how many XOs are being brought to
school and be able to track that over time.
Anna Schoolfield
Birmingham
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:28 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 18 January 2011 19:29, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > So -- going back on the traffic we've see in the last 24 months, what
> > would you highlight? What have people asked for (that wasn't
> > easy/trivial/possible)? What problems have we hea
Reporting mechanisms would be useful, such as:
Squid reporting for the locations with internet access.
I've played around with sarg for ad-hoc reports, which really came in handy
when I got claims that "the internet doesn't work." Not only is it up, but
here's what folks are looking at.
On an o
OK point taken! We have used WinSCP on networked Windows PCs too, for this
purpose.
David Leeming
Solomon Islands Rural Link
From: Anna [mailto:ascho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:11 a.m.
To: David Leeming
Cc: XS Devel
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] XS-0.7 plans
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:31 PM, David Leeming wrote:
>
> I have never tried selecting the Gnome option, but a nice GUI would be
> useful for users with limited grasp of command line stuff for file
> management. Maybe that is available already
>
>
> David Leeming
> Solomon Islands Rural Link
>
>
Great news, looking forwards to 0.7
I think three areas where we had some difficulties.
1. Perhaps making the default install easier to set eth0 up for static
config
2. Not sure if it is relevant to the build, but we would have enjoyed an
easy way to clone from a master, i.e. when setting up a cu
On 18 January 2011 19:29, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> So -- going back on the traffic we've see in the last 24 months, what
> would you highlight? What have people asked for (that wasn't
> easy/trivial/possible)? What problems have we heard that were hard to
> diagnose...?
Some items that spring to
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:29 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Ay ay ay!
>
> This last 12 months have been frantic, as I've ended up biting off a
> ton more than common sense would recommend to chew. And then chewing,
> slowly, awkwardly. Good things have come out of the hard work of this
> year, but
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Anna wrote:
> With the release of 10.1.3, I thought I'd revisit flashing an XO over the
> LAN. Here are my notes, if anyone's interested.
Interesting!
For a full reflash, as James pointed out, NANDBlaster wins. But if you
have laptops out there with an earlier 1
Ay ay ay!
This last 12 months have been frantic, as I've ended up biting off a
ton more than common sense would recommend to chew. And then chewing,
slowly, awkwardly. Good things have come out of the hard work of this
year, but the XS has been delayed.
One good piece of news is that I've helped
12 matches
Mail list logo
