On Feb 7, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now
> performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this
> is ready for merging and wider testing.
>
> xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yest
Hi Martin,
Ready for the next round of reviews for the XS work. I've now
performed basic testing of all aspects of the system, so I feel this
is ready for merging and wider testing.
xs-config: pu branch recreated. Changes since yesterday:
- 172.18.0.1 binding readded
- xs-services-check checks th
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> How will this play with XS on ARM?
It won't at all, yet.
However, the liberation of the packages from the base install is the
first step in this direction.
Daniel
___
Server-devel mailing list
Serv
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To avoid leaving the other threads dangling:
>
> I have been working on a new XS release in collaboration with the
> Zamora Teran Foundation (http://www.fundacionzt.org/). The underlying
> goal here is to move the XS to a new OS base, w
Hi,
To avoid leaving the other threads dangling:
I have been working on a new XS release in collaboration with the
Zamora Teran Foundation (http://www.fundacionzt.org/). The underlying
goal here is to move the XS to a new OS base, which supports new
hardware. The foundation has recently had a fai
