Hello Sameer,
That's correct. I'm following the wrong installation guide.
Thanks a lot.
From: Sameer Verma
To: Joenson Nithan
Cc: XS devel
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Server-devel] bash: /etc/sysconfig/olpc-scripts/domain_config: No
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Joenson Nithan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm now installing XS 0.7 on a ASUS PC by following the
> "Basic-Guide-to-installing-the-XS-School-Server" and I keep getting an error
> ("bash: /etc/sysconfig/olpc-scripts/domain_config: No such file or
> directory") when typing
Hi All,
I'm now installing XS 0.7 on a ASUS PC by following the
"Basic-Guide-to-installing-the-XS-School-Server" and I keep getting an error
("bash: /etc/sysconfig/olpc-scripts/domain_config: No such file or directory")
when typing "/etc/sysconfig/olpc-scripts/domain_config sansrikschool.org" i
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 18:16 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >
> > Adam:
> >
> > OK, let's check if the XS has the serial numbers, what is the output of
> > /usr/bin/xs-list-registration? If that shows as correct the XOs timed
> > out like in ticke
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 17:49 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
>> >> On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> >> > On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 P
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 17:49 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
> >> On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> >> > On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Adam, something i
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
>> On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> > On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>> >
>> >> Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
>> >> The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:41 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:35 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
>> I suspect that your ISP is assigning 172.18.196.1 to the
>> XS, which is then confused as to where packets destined
>> for 172.18.xx.xx should be routed.
>> eth0 and the other interfa
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 20:04 -0400, Holt wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> > On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> >
> >> Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
> >> The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
> >> using any of them.Perh
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:35 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> I suspect that your ISP is assigning 172.18.196.1 to the
> XS, which is then confused as to where packets destined
> for 172.18.xx.xx should be routed.
> eth0 and the other interfaces on the XS should be in separate
> subnets.
BTW, if this is
So move on to my next message.
I suspect that your ISP is assigning 172.18.196.1 to the
XS, which is then confused as to where packets destined
for 172.18.xx.xx should be routed.
eth0 and the other interfaces on the XS should be in separate
subnets.
wad
On Jun 4, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Holt wrote:
>
On 6/4/2012 7:32 PM, John Watlington wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
using any of them.Perhaps you meant 172.18.nn.nn ?
Wad's exactly right -- I spent too ma
On Jun 4, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Watlington wrote:
> Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
> The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
> using any of them.Perhaps you meant 172.18.nn.nn ?
And I never got around to the second part of the comment.
eth0 (the "WAN" port
Adam, something is wrong with those addresses.
The 18.nn.nn.nn subnet is owned by MIT. You shouldn't be
using any of them.Perhaps you meant 172.18.nn.nn ?
wad
On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Holt wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 3:27 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonau
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 18:19 -0400, Holt wrote:
> On 6/4/2012 3:27 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 13:15 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> XS 0.7
> OLPC build 8
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Holt wrote:
> One XO-1.5 successfully registered back on Saturday. It successfully then
> pushed 36MB to the XS' /library/users/SHC03801C2E (after running
> /usr/bin/ds-backup.sh on the XO-1.5 and waiting ~30min). So we went home
> Saturday night with a false sens
On 6/4/2012 3:27 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 13:15 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
XS 0.7
OLPC build 874
Sugar 0.92.2
The XO fails to register, but a folder is created for th
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 13:15 -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> > XS 0.7
>> > OLPC build 874
>> > Sugar 0.92.2
>> >
>> > The XO fails to register, but a folder is created for the XO on the XS
>>
Hi,
What build are you running? Registration updates config in early builds
and updates gconf in recent builds. In gconf, registration creates an
entry in /home/olpc/.gconf/desktop/sugar/%gconf.xml. This is used by the
backup procedure to recognize that the laptop is registered. In earlier
bu
19 matches
Mail list logo
