On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote:
> On
Agreed.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Martin Dluhos wrot
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Martin Dluhos wrote:
On 7.1.2014 01:49, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014
Just to add my $.02, I agree with Walter and Claudia's approach in this
paper. Making the specifics of learning visible to teachers and students,
and doing the development from this perspective, I think is the best way to
go.
Thanks.
Gerald
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
Tony,
I don't want to speak for the teachers in Nepal, but I think, Speaking as
an educator, that more real data is better than the red light green light
scenario you propose.
I would be happy to participate in the design if that would be helpful.
Gerald
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Tony And
Hi,
I am taking a simplistic approach to this problem. KA-Lite has a simple
coach
report which basically shows a table with a row for each registered student
and a column for each activity. The cell is blank for no attempts, a
light green
for attempts which did not reach 'proficiency', and a
